mdriskell ✭✭✭✭✭

I was referring to where are you doing the changes. What file are you editing?

I am having the same issue. About an hour into database maintenance a process starts blocking and crushes the server. I killed the process being blocked and the job is continuing to run. Please post their solution when you have it. I have recieved some requests from support to gather some data which I will work on…

Like I said in my initial reply it has been years so I really don't remember the process nor do I have that product to test with. I found how to integrate the product from Plixers site and there were step by step instructions at the time. If you are looking for the database login I suggest this thread Look for Andy Coates…

No problem happy to help.

Hmm that might preclude us from doing this. I have a large environment. I can't take an outage on 4 servers to do this. Sounds like a feature request.

Can you try following to confirm you have statistics in UDP ? 1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.4.2.1.14processCPUGaugeProcessor utilization for scheduling.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.4.2.1.15processUtimeTimeTicksUser time spent executing.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.4.2.1.16processStimeTimeTicksSystem time spent…

http://www.emnico.com/mib/mibsearch.php?mib=HP-UNIX&node=1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.1.2.2.1#sel1 Ok to clarify I can pull the OIDs associated with this URL which give me the filesystem and the Free Blocks. Can that be used somehow to extrapolate the file space available?

Ok so if there isn't any way from SNMP is there a way to accomplish with scripts?

I did originally open a case quite a while back and was told to upgrade to 7.1.1 but I still sporadically see the issue (not every time like I used to). I'll be going to 7.2 later this quarter so we shall see. Until then I put this workaround in place.

We are an enterprise customer so no window works great. I don't believe in doing too much change at once so I typically upgrade modules individually. With us using everything but NTA that means about every month I need an outage to do some type of upgrade. I'm talking a fail-over engine not additional polling engines so in…

Here's a dumb question does accessing the site work from a browser on the polling server? If so your server could be in a white list. Just a thought.

I'm not aware of any traps that work like that....those numbers should never change as they are unique OIDs..if you get a different one it means a different trap condition is met. I suggest getting the MIBs uploaded to support so that those OIDs can be translated. That being said my other comment about matching within the…

Thanks that's great news. We are doing log parsing on Windows, Linux, and Unix. I'm not much of a script guy bug if you can get me pointed in the right direction I have resources I can work with. FYI I literally laughed out loud at the profile pic...Has me thinking about happy little trees :)

The device type gives you the model number if supplied by the manufacturer in the SNMP query. You could create a custom property tied to each device and give it a more generic name such as Router/Switch/Server which then you could report on.

It's very tiny and directly to the left of the checkbox.

Thanks. So all I need is an ESX account with read-only permissions. That is what I needed to know.

So to make matters even worse the repair of the Orion Core services has truncated my trap rules again. This marks the third time this has happened (did it on my last two NPM upgrades). Specifically the Trap Detail section of Table TrapRules gets truncated down to 30 characters which breaks most of the rules we have in…

Running diags now for support...as soon as I'm done I'm going to replace all the SDF files as this seems to get the system running again.

MDRISKELL: A couple of things I noticed: First, I would change the field in the last line of your graphic to "Volume Percent Used", the same as the condition group above. Just for consistencies sake. You don't HAVE to, but it's the way I'd do it. That also may be why you can't compare the two fields (maybe a type mismatch)…

Thanks....I had seen that one this morning as well. These got me thinking about some tricks I have used throughout the years with the product. May have to think on it a little and then post a couple.

When you are going through the configuration manager after an initial setup it will attempt to use the previous information. It is by no means a default it is just auto-populating with the prior settings. As Sirpaw stated if you do not have the password you will need someone with SQL knowledge to create you a new account…

Never tried it but appears it can be done from SNMP. Found a doc here but I'm sure there is an official CISCO guide somewhere. Writing a cisco device's config via snmp

No you can't delete it because this is exactly what I need is an active discussion to try and come up with a solution . Wonder if it would be possible to have some kind of stored procedure to update the engine IDs before inserting the replicated data to "trick" it into thinking it's their own nodes. Also in your scenario…

Just out of curiosity are you receiving these linkups from another community other than public? Your original post shows you have them filtered to public only.

Sure it's basically the same report but I altered slightly to give it to me by Node and then the applications. Both the Node and Application are live urls that will go into the appropriate areas. What I would really like is to add one more level to this but I haven't figured that part out yet. I would like to show a tree…

For instant notifications of any type of flapping or error an SNMP trap will always be quicker than a poll regardless of the management program utilized. To poll your devices every 10 seconds puts unnecessary loads on the network. It is considered best practice to take these type of alerts via a trap and not a poll. I have…

Thanks I know it's probably as much of a blessing as it is a curse but this is part of what separates SolarWinds away from the rest of the pack is the staff's involvement in the community.

I emailed support this morning because it has been two days since I have heard anything. I need some sort of answer back.

Thanks for the clarification....the reason we were looking to disable is we get a memory in warning (with no further details) however when the team checks the server itself all memory sticks pass their tests so we don't know why the warning is triggered.