quote:Originally posted by Isaachi peel,Yes and no.You can go up to 3 layers deep when grouping nodes. I am not certain you can do what you're describing though. It sounds as if you would like one network element dependant on another to be listed under it in the grouping. Here is a way you may be able to pull this off:Both nodes:Location (you could use the SNMP location field as well) [Toronto]On the Cisco 2950ParentNode [Cisco-3550]On the Cisco 3550ParentNode [] (leave this field blank)Then group on Location first and ParentNode second.This will come close to providing the group set you are looking for.