The most recent content from our members.
Today we are pleased to announce that the latest version of SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, version 10.4, is now available. For existing customers, you will see this within your customer portal within the next few days. NPM v10.4 is a robust and effective network management software that packs a lot of great new…
Hi, I just installed NPM 10.4 general release ( and I had this with 10.4 RC3 ), I cannot get the hardware status, from an F5 at firmware version 11.2.1. It was working when the F5 was at 10.2.4. Thank you, Martin
Have this a lot after a member is taken out of pool to do some work on then added back in. when a member is taken doen in the pool we get the forced down when it is brought back up in the f5, solarwinds seems to get the wrong info and leaves as down showing the below error /Common/tcp: Could not connect.; No successful…
All I can find is a video for setting up in F5. Are there written detailed instructions anywhere? This is all I can locate. https://support.solarwinds.com/Success_Center/Network_Performance_Monitor_(NPM)/Network_Insight_for_F5%C2%AE_BIG-IP%C2%AE__-_Video
If you are backing up an F5 BigIP device (Not using tmsh), with a large config, you can use the "modify cli preference pager disabled" command to disable paging. This should prevent timeouts.
Hi, Im not sure how many people use BIG LTM for loadbalancing out there, but I was hoping that work could be done, in a similar way to the Wireless Controllers and ESX that could monitor Virtual servers on F5 BIG IP. The dashboard on the BIGIP is not the greatest and I would prefer to monitor from SW. Regards Miron
Hi I am trying to create some custom pollers for CPU usage and Throughput for F5 BIGIP and running into some problems. Looking at the docs provided by F5 Here is how they suggest reporting on CPU Usage.. The question, I have is how do you create two separate polls at 10 seconds apart 1. Perform two separate polls of total…
I have a number of F5 load balancers I want to monitor in NPM. They're all running 9.x and are of a varying physical footprints from 1500's up to 6900's. I discover them, they are recognized as F5 devices (as indicated by the F5 logo being associated), but never get any meaningful data back. I see a lot of chatter about…
It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.