quote:Originally posted by pancamoBesides the top 3 requests(Custom MIBS, Trap Handling and Port Monitoring) Here are some easy requests:3. Ability to automate discovery.4. Ability to import a list of devices5. Ability to place a node in Maintenance Mode for X hours6. Ability to Group Devices in the Win32 App7. Ability to Manage Nodes(add/delete/edit) from the Web8. Ability to set/override thresholds on individual nodes.
quote:Originally posted by jjohonnessIs Solar Winds working on these requests?Custom MIB importingTrap receiving and correlation
quote:Originally posted by aLTeReGoI just bought this product and I'm very disappointed that the port descriptions on my Cat6500 series switches are not populated automatically. As I have well over 100 ports per 6500 this is a huge pain in the ass.How about before we trick this product out with all sorts of cool new features like syslog and such, we nail down the basics first.
quote:Originally posted by Network_Guru
quote:Originally posted by webcrawlr quote:Originally posted by aLTeReGoI just bought this product and I'm very disappointed that the port descriptions on my Cat6500 series switches are not populated automatically. As I have well over 100 ports per 6500 this is a huge pain in the ass.How about before we trick this product out with all sorts of cool new features like syslog and such, we nail down the basics first.
quote:Originally posted by iunderwoJust a comment in here on the anti-IIS comment...The problem isn't with IIS per-se. The problem lies with the default security model being very lax, and with admins who don't keep up with server patch levels. To dismiss the program on the grounds that it runs on a Microsoft platform is faulty logic, because any platform can be open to exploit.The beauty of Orion is that you don't need to be an expert to set it up and start collecting data.// Ian Underwood - Service Management// Level 3 Communications
quote:Originally posted by angusIn order of preference:1. Port monitoring with predefined stuff for protocols like SNMP,http, https, sql and DNS2. Netflow3. Policy based approach to alert definition. The polices can then be applied to the monitored objects. Unless I am missing someting, the current method is tedius and cumbersome and would the chances of alert "noise".Nice to haveDynamic baselining - there is a radical change in traffic profile between work hours and non off hours. This creates a problem for us when setting alerts. Suggestions workarround are welcommed
quote:Originally posted by gonzajohI don't agree I'm afraid. In order of importance IMO....1. Custom Mib reporting / alerting2. TRAP HANDLING (can't believe they missed that one!!)3. Device GroupingOne could argue that NPM is a NETWORK performance monitor (up to L3 OSI). What you are requesting is monitoring APPLICATIONS (ports and services) - not the same thing.I agree however that it would be a 'nice to have' - and in fact, should not be too difficult to achieve
quote:Better device inventory report (serial numbers)
quote:(Suppress Alert until X)We reboot equipment from time to time and it's a real pain that everyone's pager/cell phone has to go off because someone rebooted a server. It would be nice to have a method of saying "do not alert unless the node has been down for at least "x" ammount of time".
quote:Originally posted by rixSign if you think the biggest feature improvement to Orionshould be service/port monitoring ala WUG.I personally think it would be incredible then.Strength in numbers, make yourself heard.maybe v7.5Thanks,-Network Janitor(time to empty the bit bucket)
quote:Originally posted by aSquaredSidetrack a little. Has anyone here overcome the issue of ORION not able to monitor Service ports. Do you have any alternatives to this?
quote:Originally posted by 2020 quote:Originally posted by aSquaredSidetrack a little. Has anyone here overcome the issue of ORION not able to monitor Service ports. Do you have any alternatives to this?
quote:Originally posted by gertSNMP v3
quote:Originally posted by perduenoc1. Netflow support2. SNMP Trap support3. Custom MIBs
quote:Originally posted by ckore1. Trap Mapping2. Audible Alarms
For all of you interested in monitoring custom MIBs, we are working on some of the pieces for this now and we need your input. If you're interested in becoming a part of a working group/beta testing group please contact me directly. Thanks, Josh Stephens SolarWinds.Net josh@solarwinds.net
Coming from a 30 year background in Event/Alarm management Management (Netcool, CA, Openview, Smarts, etc......) a very good area for the Solarwinds
company to improve upon would be the Operator interface for alarm,trap, event management. At my present location Openview remains due to the shortcoming of
Solarwinds as it pertains to these areas.
Phase 1 would be to improve the ability to manipulate the alarms, events, traps and why not syslog too:
Suggestion:
geoffinva3
You're posting on a really old thread. The first post was from 2003 and the last post before yours was 2006. We have released quite a few times since then, and most of what's requested in this very long thread has been delivered.
I'm also wondering what version of NPM you're using because v9.5 can do quite a bit of what you're asking for here. We replace hp all the time. Have you tried v9.5?
Denny,
I am running the latest version! Most of what I have stated has not been delivered. In fact we had Solarwinds enginnering and sales visit the Veterans Affairs Departmnet back in Januarary 2009. As a followup to the meeting tey requested I put together the requirements for an advanced alarm browser which I did. We have not heard any response since that email thread. I will be gal to foward it to you.
Geoff - 304-262-5229 I invite you to call me to discuss my points in this thread.
Thanks
Geoffrey.chambers@va.gov
Support over the weekend is an absolute must!
I can't push my replacement of IBM Tivoli any further with my company when there is no support over Saturday and Sunday.
Companies that are 24/7/365 like us MUST have access to support 24/7/365.
Audit tracking would be great.. somthing to track who deleted, added, updated nodes, accounts, and APMs would be a good start..
I agree. We've been asking for this for years. Hopefully, SolarWinds will recognize there is a need within the community for this and fill that need.
This list is a little dated... We now have "What we are working on" posts in which you can see what others have requested. Audit tracking is a well-known feature request (see comments here). Please add your voice to the vote if this is something you would like to see.
Here is a post for all "What we are working on" threads sorted by product.
Thanks,DH