So many silo's of tools and platforms is our biggest challenge, some are run by different teams for different purposes so coordinating access to these adds time and red tape to any request for data.
ALL of the above along with the tools required to do the work simply cost to much money when all employers are trying to save money.
You can plan all you'd like until you find out there are several projects no one mentioned.
We don't really have any issues getting management/section/user buy in. I just wish the sections would use the tools to their fullest capabilities. There is a lot of functionality that they are not using.
All of the above1- Products that are too complex to run or see value from2- Getting management buy in/investment to these types of tools3- Combination of too many tools
Simplistic linear forecasting is not sufficient and often neither are tools focused on one layer. Capacity planning and rightsizing has to take data from a number of layers and functions to be truly useful and accurate. Users need to have confidence that when a tool suggests a ceiling will be hit in 3 months, or that resources can be changed, these are aligned to the technical and business needs.
Having the time to plan for capacity needs in the future.
Getting management to share their dreams .. we have a great environment - but when you start throwing a couple more Tb of data that has not been planned can get a little frustrating.
Lack of planning by other departments, then bringing in IT at the last minute, wanting it done right then when all personnel are working other projects or assisting other users, then getting upset and acting as if it is all your fault and not willing to help them.
For us it's the tyranny of the "next big thing" pushing the required upgrades downstream until they become a crisis.
Unannounced projects popping up.