Anyone else have issue where the Wireless tables in the database appear to be a lot larger than any other table?
Example we monitor over 1,700 nodes in NPM....6,000 interfaces. Our interface traffic detail table is 5G in size.
We have roughly 20 Cisco Wireless controllers with 200 AP's and the wireless interface detail table is 10G in size.
Is this normal? I noticed the past couple days my db maintenance job won't finish and it fails when summarizing detail in NW_Wireless.
I opened a case but wanted to see what others are seeing in their databases. Seems like something isn't right.