Number of Hardware Health Issues Alerted per Node

rwilliamh

As an example, we have a few existing and past nodes that initially had a single reported "Critical" hardware health issue that was dismissed as a faulty sensor or inconsequential and is ignored.  If subsequent hardware issues occur, the "Critical" alert does not change to notify of additional hardware health issues that need to be looked at.

So I suggest adding like a number by the node name to indicate the number of different hardware health alerts.

Example:

     Nodes with Hardware Status: Critical

     <Red Dot> NodeName (2)

Now if I am monitoring for hardware health issues, I would hopefully not ignore a node that has long been alerting on a known particular hardware health issue has incurred another.

rwilliamh

I am the author of this feature request.  I now keep a spreadsheet of false-positive critical alerts and every so often I revisit currently 12 nodes to be sure that no NEW hardware alerts have occurred.  Currently from the Summary page if you click on Critical for hardware status you only see those nodes by name.  It would be more informative to display for each node what those hardware errors are.

For example:

NODE-A (Memory, Disk)

NODE-B (Fan, CPU)

NODE-C (Battery)

NODE-D (Power Supply, Disk, Memory)