2025.2 Forced utilization of the new IPAM UI is unacceptable.

bdraper

The product is unpolished, clunky and generally orders of magnitude worse than the old UI of IPAM.  There is tons of wasted space where data could be displayed in the table.  When you update an IP with information it takes you back to the first page of the scope.  The advanced search feature returns an error anytime you search ANYTHING.  The normal search doesn't work unless you are drilled down to the scope you are looking for which COMPLETELY defeats the point of a search function.  The new UI is so much slower than the old one seemingly for a net loss of performance and usability.  Who designed this, how'd this get passed testing and WHY ARE YOU FORCING ME TO USE IT!?  Updates that result in a loss of performance and functionality is ridiculous for the price you charge your users.

kencancast

We just upgraded to 2025.2 two weeks ago and agree that the functionality of the new IPAM UI is not "user friendly" which seems typical with the major updates, there is always a "bug" or "problem" with development/enhancements of the product. The search on the page does not work, if it does not work then why display it? Force people into the Advanced Search or give guidance on how to fix the issue with the search bar on the page. I also agree that the new page is slower, updating IPs takes you back to the first page of the scope, and total disregard for the option to takes us back to the old page. I thought about pulling the page from backups, although it is hard to tell what that would break in the product and ruin a day of work.