stuartd · Senior Dogsbody · ✭✭✭✭✭

Yes, as I said above there are LOTS of options, you just have to decide how you want to approach this. We have 10,000 devices and about half as many groups, so we have to created a widget that allows us to see at a glance what "groups" and what "maps" they appear on. The way we have done this is: * Go to the template you…

I will answer on the other duplicate post.

This appears to be similar (almost identical in fact) to your question in NPM group: Device related to which group I've added some thoughts there that may help, but you definitely need to explain what you are trying to achieve.

Hmm, well support would definitely suggest you upgrade if not to the latest, at least a more recent version. And avoid 2025.1 as it had a fair few bugs which I believe were mostly fixed in 2025.1.1

Can you provide more information on what you are looking to achieve? Do you mean map group, vendor group, custom property group, etc, etc? But as an example, if I have a custom property called 'Responsible Team' I can do a number of things, including but not limited to: * Go to Manage Nodes and adjust the view to include…

You don't say what version of SW you're running, but we also have an issue with groups. It's not quite the same as yours, and in our case some lower level groups also appear as root groups. This is on ver 2024.4.0 and it was identified as a bug. So, if you are running the same version then the advice from support was to…

And that's one of our "simple" ones 

On the first reply, you downvoted me

Why the downvote?

Hi, I presume you've read/seen this: https://solarwindscore.my.site.com/SuccessCenter/s/article/Add-MIBs-to-the-SolarWinds-MIB-database?language=en_US 

AIRPRO is a new brand name to me, but I strongly suspect that is one where you will have to "build it yourself" and then share with the community. My approach would be to take a current upgrade template, say a Cisco one, and then adjust it to suit the command structure of the AIRPRO. You might even need to reach out to the…

You don't state what version you are running, but I strongly suggest opening a ticket with support.

> I've read about the somewhat hacky solution involving Network Atlas and matching the map name It's not hacky, and to abuse a Star Wars quote, then: "This is the way". We have well North of 1000 maps on our primary instance, and the only way to make them useful is to link them to the group name. The process is…

I believe the issue is probably due to the sheer amount of data that it has to filter through.

I don't have an answer for your specific query, but I found the same issue when I was querying a sister table, the OLM.LogEntryFieldValue. I got around it using this approach: * I added in an extra field to narrow down the query. In my case I did WHERE Name = 'VarBindingValues' AND TextValue Like '%My_Search%' Looking at…

I've not tried this myself but you almost certainly will need to create a UnDP to extract the relevant data from an OID on the Palo Alto that provides this. Once that is done, reporting on it should be reasonably straightforward.

Where is this icon wrong (also asked this of you on identical post in the NPM forum)? Is this on node details? Does node details identify it correctly? If yes, is it using a custom poller? Is it in a specific other view? What 'view type' is it set as? Give us some clue?

Not a clue I've never tried combining that way and I'm not a coder in any shape or form so have no idea. I've not even looked at the XML of a report that has multiple data blocks. All I know is you can create multiple data blocks from within the report builder.

I'm not the best at coding and most of what I do is hacked together but that looks right. What I do is code it up, but adjust the figures so that they trigger to show a result. So maybe I'd start by lowering the 95% threshold until I get a result. Then I'd check the output and see if it meets the other criteria. 

To be clear, I'm talking about creating a custom poller and not just a partial poller? if it say it's not a match then something is either not supported or possibly the wrong OID has been used? When creating the poller did you set one of your rSeries to be the "test node"? If yes, and all responded with appropriate data at…

I'm guessing the Test Servers group is a custom property? In which case you would need to link to the custom properties table. You should be able to do an implicit link, so no JOIN required. As you've already labelled the orion.nodes table as data, then It would look something like this: In your SELECT line,…

Set your trigger condition to be like this: Then in the bottom box copy/paste the following: RIGHT JOIN ( Select EngineID, brokepercent from ( select sum(broken.total) as total , sum(broken.count_broken) as broke , sum(broken.count_broken)*100/sum(broken.total) as brokepercent , broken.engineID from ( Select Case When…

If what you need isn't visible then you will need to create a custom poller. They are relatively straightforward to do, just you need to make sure you have all necessary OIDs. Then you assign it and do a poll now and wait for a refresh.…

I've tried to do this and had a few discussions with MVPs and the end result was that the best way to do this was by monitoring/reporting on the 'Nodes.LastSystemUpTimePollUtc' - however, so long as ICMP is still working we don't deem this as a critical issue. So, the other side of this coin is in monitoring if an APE…

A fellow MVP said he had the same issue and when he cleared his cache it fixed it. Be worth trying that, and if not then raise a support ticket.

Change where? And what version of SW?

@"jvb" or @"chad.every" - any ideas on this? Also tagging in @"kpina" in case she has any other resources to ask.

You can do this by creating new 'sections' in a report. Each set of data then appears in individual sheets when exported to Excel.. e.g. 

Hmm, odd. I'd definitely open a ticket with support.

With Network Atlas we have to reduce the 'zoom' to allow us to see some of our maps but the quality has always been ok even when zooming in using the browser controls. In contrast, I've not seen a quality issue with Orion Maps except when the map is associated to a 'group' [so we have 1000's of maps and all are…