romeoguerrero

I would also like to have this functionality. up-voted.

Any improvements in this functionality would be helpful. It's pretty much useless for me right now the way it is.

Managing credential sets in VNQM is horrible. You cannot edit a credential set and you cannot delete a credential set. I opened a support ticket to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious, and they confirmed this. Consolidating credentials should [hopefully] resolve this issue.

In the release notes, it mentions that the Guest account was removed. Will this affect the DirectLink functionality? I know this may seem obvious, but I have always used the DirectLink as a guest account, hence my confusion.

upvoted

I'd like this, too.

VSS isn't just some old outdated technology. It is used with modern/current platforms as well. I am up-voting this one. The issue we are having is with the backup VSL links. Yes they are down, but that is normal when the primary VSL is up, so it's not a problem.

Hi Jose, I'm curious as to why this is a feature request instead of a bug type of request? I could be wrong, but I believe the OIDs for interface statistics are the same regardless if it's layer 2 or layer 3. What info did tech support provide that led to a feature request? Either way, I up-voted this as we have the same…

Agreed. It's nice that Solarwinds provides a free tool, but frankly, that tool sucks​ is not meant for enterprise. It doesn't support shared certificates. We have problems with it randomly stopping. This problem happened on an old Server 2008 server, and it even happens to us on a brand new Server 2016 instance we just…

I'll take a look at the logs. I appreciate all the suggestions. If I anything interesting, I'll let you know.

Ah yes. You have explicitly set up a specific action. We don't have any of that going on here.

Yes I actually even did raw SQL queries int the DB Manager trying to find any piece of data of why Solarwinds would say the interfaces are warning status. No luck there either. It wouldn't/couldn't be a Syslog or Trap. Correct? Those are not truly integrated into the SNMP polled side of things the way people seem to think.…

HI, I have installed v1.4 and having what looks like a different, though similar issue. I start a new report. I entered the local credentials, and I noticed that it automatically put the username of the local credential into the CCO ID field. The local credentials work fine and "test connectivity" works. But now I have the…

I know this is an old post, but it solved my NCM compliance rules woes with end of line $. I even had a support case opened and they couldn't figure it out. Thank you!!

I know you may be directing this to either myself, the OP, or both. I have definitely checked those thresholds. In fact, that was the first place I pointed Solarwinds tech support to look at. At no time have any of those thresholds been breached. The Solarwinds data bears this out in every single instance.

@jdchaiken Thanks for sharing your work. I am going to add on some functions. I was wondering if you have continued to use it and how is it working for you? Thanks, Romeo

I get the same behavior on physical interfaces. It is not limited to port-channels. As mentioned, if I add the interface to monitoring, it won't matter because I still see no netflow data. So Then I have the problem where a use navigates to the interface expecting to find Netflow data, and the entire page says "No Data…

rschroeder​ do you remember if you had to deal with any false positives for java jre? We use the same tools and we keep getting told that we have a java jre vulnerability. Solarwinds has confirmed that the Job Engine v2 does leverage java and there's no way around it.

Skreezanx, I know that one possibility is if the Cisco account you are using isn't set up properly, it can cause that error. We ran into that problem and had to work with our VAR to get the account set up right. Just having a normal Cisco CCO account connected to our contracts wasn't enough. It required some other stuff on…

Thanks for the reply, Alex81! That's good to hear. We will be refreshing our servers and I didn't have a way to test.

Sorry it took so long to get back here, but I did manage to resolve this issue for my case, anyway. Something that I learned is that when Solarwinds SNMP queries for interface status/statistics, if it does not get a response, this is another circumstance where the interface will be marked as Warning. So my fix I still…

I have pretty much the same problem. I get TONS of alerts saying interfaces are in warning status, but there is no data whatsoever, in the device or in Solarwinds, to explain why Solarwinds thinks the interfaces should be flagged as warning. I have opened 2 separate support cases 1341821 and 1369990 for this issue with no…

Here's what we determined. Stibi is correct about the flow packets do reference the input and output interfaces for the traffic, regardless of which interfaces have flow monitors configured. The notification that we are getting is saying that we received a flow packet that references an interface that we are not managing.…

The "interesting" thing about this is that if we go ahead and add the interface to netflow monitoring, we give it a while (over a day now) to populate data, but when we go to the netflow details page for that interface, we get "Data is not available" for every resource on the page. I think this is the smoking gun to show…

I don't know if this was a known issue, but it is working for me now in IPAM 4.7.0. We were running on 4.3.2 before.

Thanks jstinson1!