qle ✭✭✭✭✭

Tim, thanks for catching that. The first line should read: <a href='<%= string.Format("/NetPerfMon/RemoteDesktop.asp?Server={0}", this.MyNode.IPAddress) %>' target="_blank"> It was there when I originally composed it. It looks like Community Server tried to process that part of the message.

That worked a treat. Thanks, James!

As it is right now (I'm assuming this feature hasn't improved much, if at all, in NPM 9.5), you can suppress an alert based on the status of another node(s). That is, the conditions in the Alert Suppression tab will query against all nodes. You could have an alert that fires when any server goes down but is suppressed when…

Yeah, I have this setup. What/where did you configure the mouseover events? Are you using overlibmws or something to accomplish this? What's the actual code you setup for the mouseover?

It is listed under events as Event Type Flow Correlation Service Started. As mentioned previously though, I don't see a native function that will alert based on this activity.

curtisi‌, awesome answer. I'm sorry, I should have been more clear with the question. I was looking for both a performance and storage comparison between searching the live data versus the archive. Since you've explained that the archive would be pulled back into a separate instance of LEM, this question is moot. Again,…

Is this an active alert? That is, is it currently triggering and taking some action now or is this an alert definition that you're trying to remove?

I don't believe this is possible. If my understanding is correct, once a node goes down, Orion will scan through your defined alerts. If it finds trigger conditions that match the attributes of this specific node, it'll fire. I cannot/will not consider anything about another node at all during this process.

To expand on Network_Guru's request, is there any way to reorder the list of elements? At this point, it seems like the list is ordered according to when the element was added to the map.

Another question - this one about creating component monitors. Cana component monitor be assigned directly to a node for monitoring, or must it be assigned to an application monitor (even if it is the only one assigned)? The reason I ask is that I noticed that the Component Monitor Library shows only Application Monitors…

I'm only seeing "Percent Loss" under: Network Nodes > Current Response Time > Percent Loss Where are you seeing "Percent Loss" under Interfaces?

Ok, I attempted to modify jtimes' report to your preference. Just as there is for a down node, there is a source to calculate outage duration from the database. Create a new Advanced SQL report and insert the following SELECT StartTime.EventTime, APM_Application.Name, Nodes.Caption, Nodes.Location, StartTime.Message,…

Your alert will trigger for any of the three volumes you listed for LEO. However, the message can only be customized to provide information on only one of the volumes at a time. That is, if only one of the three volumes are full, you'll only get one message. However, if all three volumes are full, you'll get three separate…

I don't think that's necessary but if you want to try it, why not configure the reset condition to match the trigger condition? I'm assuming that it doesn't even appear in your list of active advanced alerts.

Have you tried restarting the APM services?

Is this a problem with only this alert or all alerts?

So, aren't you able to leverage NFA to meet your needs?

Yes, if you make any modifications to the trigger condition, the alert will reset and trigger again, if applicable.

Couldn't you just enable the option to "Execute this Action repeatedly while the Alert is triggered" for the alert action and set it to execute once every 24 hours/1 day or am I completely misunderstanding this?

Ok, I didn't know that you were using tables to define the layout. Another option would be to use inline CSS but in my brief testing, it can get cumbersome. I agree with you that having the option to disable automatic replacement of carriage returns with <br /> tags would certainly be help in these cases.

The solution suggested by Network Guru in that thread is excellent but you've pointed the exact reasons as to why I have not implemented it myself. SolarWinds has indicated that it is on the roadmap to have some kind of intelligence included in NPM that will automatically determine dependencies. If my memory serves me…

I don't want to speak for Denny but it sounds like that change information isn't stored anywhere in the database so there would be no way to create a report with that information.

Just curious, under which chart are you looking for this option?

The resource I'm referring to is Summary Reports -> Percent Utilization on all Interfaces. Keep in mind that when you first add the resource, it will display all of your monitored interfaces so it may take a couple of minutes (or longer).

D'oh! Oh so right. Sorry about that. I don't think that commenting on events is currently possible. Sounds like this would have to be a feature request.

Keep in mind that process name will appear blank for components such as WMI counters or port monitors. Have you tried adding ${ComponentName} to your alert message to determine the actual component that's triggering the alert?

Check out the following blog post for an overview of UDT's capabilities. Finding where devices are connected in your network

Have you confirmed whether escalation is enabled for your defined alert action?

Thanks borgan, that helped. Mark/SolarWinds, what would it take to include version and service pack level in the web console like somewhere on the module configuration page?

Try this: update mrxinu's query so that you specify the number of minutes it was down. ${SQL:select top 1 datediff(minute,e.eventtime,getdate()) from events e where e.nodeid = '${Node.NodeID}'} You see the change I inserted in bold? You can change that to anything from a year down to a nanosecond. Hopefully, that works for…