michal.hrncirik

Hi Michael, I'm not sure if I understand correctly. IPSLA has a possibility to delete already created operations (created via IPSLAManager or imported). Could you please give me an example of what do you mean exactly?

thanks for your time!

you can try to create a new report - select IPAM events type - and then add all required fileds as "user", "event message", "event type" or any other you are interested in.

http://www.solarwinds.com/documentation/IPSLA/docs/IPSLAManagerAdministratorGuide.pdf

Latest one is Beta 2 and it is not ready for production use (you need to wait for RC a while but you will miss a chance to give us a feedback on Beta build )

IPAM 2.0.1 HotFix 1 is now available to resolve this problem. You can download it here: http://downloads.solarwinds.com/solarwinds/Release/HotFix/IPAM-v2.0.1-HotFix1.zip Follow the instructions that are part of this package.

understand john. would you mind to have a short call about more details regarding your use-case for multicast?

got it

Hi, we are not able to reproduce the issue you described. Could you please contact our support so we can investigate it further? thanks, Michal

Hi Andrew, thanks for a feedback you gave me during yesterday call. I'm looking forward to hear more from you regarding user delegation feature. regards, Michal

So if I understand correctly, you would like to have just control over what NPM polls correct? Is it because security reasons, performance? Also, when you've seen multicast feature in NPM, don't you see that useful for your multicast-enabled environment?

that helps, thanks.

Hi Deltona, I can confirm this is the current limitation of IPAM as it doesn't support additional polling engine. I'm looking on technical possibilities to let IPAM use existing additional polling engine for NPM that monitors your DHCP server already/Node without a need of having AP IPAM package. When you described that…

Thanks guys. Adding additional state is an option. If you would have a choice: 1) having this addresses as "Available" with some descriptive default text in vnext or 2) having new state (for example "Network/system") in the future. what option you would go for (I'm trying to understand what is your time priority for that).…

we've confirmed that the scenario you need works only in a case there are no supernets. but your scenario is valid and I've opened internal feature (FB285720)http://fogbugz.swdev.local/default.asp?285720 request and I've assigned that for the future implementation.

Hi Shay, that's why we didn't write "it is supported" on Cisco only. We are always keeping in mind the majority HW of customers requesting a certain feature. It was Cisco gear for multicast but it doesn't mean it won't work for other devices that respond to the same OIDs. But we tested on Cisco devices primarily in order…

feel free to share with us if IPAM solved all your problems or if there are areas that are not covered and high priority for you.

Also, as it is written in the blog post - loopbacks interfaces make sense mainly for routers or devices with more physical interfaces with different IP on each. If you have just a bunch of end-stations with single physical interface and IP address then I would not use their loopback to be monitored via NPM - you should be…

great, thanks.

Hi guys, I'm sorry for late response (vacation). Thanks for pointing out to the inconsistency in our EOL/EOS messaging and v3.11. The truth is 3.11 will be moved under EOS/EOE soon as we do not any longer improving NTA on SQL data store. All the new functionality (including app-flows, QoS management, etc.) will be…

with obligatory no commitments, it can help you to you feel better after next episode of the new Top Gear with Evans

Hi Jamie, we are currently in the process of creating a template for adding various Wireless devices/vendors. It would help me and the team, if you can send us SNMP walks from as many devices you could. This will be used as a validation of our "template" mechanism and significantly accelerate support for your devices.…

I think you can use ICMP Path Jitter operations since this doesn't require responders on your endpoints. We didn't test ASA devices you mentioned - but it should work if it does support IPSLA (according to Cisco webpage). You can try it for free and see the outcome. let me know if you need some help. thanks, Michal

I'm glad we have helped you. Fee free to mark the correct answer so this topic question will be closed. thanks! Michal

ok, thanks.

Hi Jon, Unfortunately Cisco knows that there are some values reported differently via different MIBs/OIDs. From NPM side, we don't want to "translate" reported sensor values and fix issues on the vendor side. You may probably know but we have introduced an option to switch to different MIB in order to poll correct values…

yes, this is temporary workaround. Please contact our support and they will help you with applying of this workaround. We are working on permanent solution. thanks!

Hi everyone, we are investigating various BIND configurations and I would like to ask you for small help. Would some of you send us “named.config” working file that contains the “stub Zone” ? We would like to validate our data with a real environment. You can send it directly to me: michal.hrncirik at solarwinds.com…

Hi, I'll try to simulate your problem and let you know back! thanks, Michal

thanks for your input we (product management) hear you.