mhlevy

Comments

  • I really agree with this. Our company has multiple in-house developed applications running on multiple servers through load balancers, using custom, high port numbers (tcp/65003), or even better, being able to specify IP addresses (or ranges of IP addresses, and ports, for instance "to or from 192.168.150.230:65006" or "to…
    in Custom (non-HTTP) application monitoring for QoE Comment by mhlevy February 2016
  • Re: The "You Don't Know Thwack" Surface contest, does completing the "Onboarding Mission" automagically enter us into the contest? Thanks! I've already found a great deal of useful information, contributed to an RFE, and posted a question! Not bad for someone who's only been a member of Thwack for less than a couple of…
    in You Don't Know THWACK - The Onboarding Mission Comment by mhlevy February 2016
  • My guess is that it's not going to happen, since this would cut into the market for the SAM (Server Application Management.) Of course, I'm just assuming that SAM can integrate with QOE. In the mean time, I was going to give Nagios another try, but I recall all the hassles of the configuration files and the fact that I'm…
    in Custom (non-HTTP) application monitoring for QoE Comment by mhlevy April 2016
  • Please excuse this input, but I'm just wondering, if the version of NTA accespts Netflow V9, is there a reason for restricting the output to V5? Is it possible that might be the problem. I'm afraid that I'm a complete newbie when it comes to Netflow, however I was finally able to get Netflow to output I happened to notice…
    in Has ANYONE got Flexible Netflow working on 4500 with Sup7 that is understandable by Solarwinds Netflow Comment by mhlevy February 2016
Avatar