macnugetz

irishjd, We have many Federal customers that are using Net-SNMP for Windows in order to use SNMP v3. -Craig

I've logged these. Thanks for the feedback! -Craig

rsprim- This is still on our roadmap, although we can't commit to a date or release at this time. -Craig

No worries... just wanted to make sure you were posting in the right place. :-) -Craig

Unfortunately, we don't have a good workaround for you here. I've logged your alert question as a feature request. -Craig

Maybe some community members would like to post some screenshots? There is actually another thread where users have posted screenshots of their Orion homepages here. HTH, Craig

Let me do some digging and circle back with you. That post is admittedly several years old, and this is the first time I’ve personally heard a customer inquire about this.

Understood. It sounds like you're trying to get a screenshot onto the remote system. Is that accurate? If that's the case, this is not what the 'Screenshot' feature was designed for. The 'Screenshot' button was designed to easily take a screenshot of the remote system to be saved on the machine where you're actually…

If your maintenance is current, you should be able to download it from your SolarWinds Customer Portal. HTH, Craig

I have logged this as a feature request. -Craig

Theoretically that could work if you're blocking the port that MRC is using, but it would block all connections on that port.

Checking...

This is not currently a report we have out of the box. You can view this data for a short period through Operation Availability resource in the Web Console. You're not the first customer that has requested this report; I have logged it as a feature request. Thanks, Craig

The write strings are only required for creating an operation on the device, which is why you were able to add the device to IPSLAM without any problem. You've raised an excellent point about usability, though; we shouldn't tell you the configuration was successful if we weren't able to actually write an operation to the…

Good deal. Glad you got it sorted.

Sorry for the delayed reply. At this point I would go ahead and open a support ticket.

Brandon, the release candidate should be in your portal. Please let us know if it's not. -Craig

Please open a support ticket so we can take a closer look.

The discovery feature is basically looking at your Orion Cisco devices and checking for a couple of things. We check if you valid SNMP read strings, then we check for a specific OID that tells if the device is IP SLA capable. To answer your first question, IP SLA Manager communicates with the device via SNMP. Valid write…

Please open a support ticket and reference this thwack post. -Craig

We recently released a hotfix addressing some of the known issues around performance counters where users were getting timeouts or an 'invalid category' error.

You can find detailed information on how to create a UnDP in the NPM Admin Guide, chapter 16, page 207. Here is a link. The thread I mentioned doesn't go into UnDPs; it was just another request for supporting Alcatel devices. -Craig

No problem. It's actually not a bad idea to automate this (if that's technically feasible). I've added this as a feature request (253831). -Craig

The Gateway is a separate license. There is a pricing calculator on the Serv-U site that should be able to help you estimate license costs. Serv-U FTP Server Pricing HTH, Craig

Hi chaldz, it looks like you opened a support ticket. Dev is investigating and we'll report back here with our findings.

Not possible today at the subnet level. You can do this globally, but checking that setting on the subnet will disable all scanning for that subnet (both ICMP and SNMP).

Yes, it would; however, we have added functionality in the next release that will allow you to do this on a per operation basis as opposed to globally on the node. -Craig

Hi Dave, Sorry for the confusion. You do need to install IP SLA Manager on both primary and secondary pollers. There is no license implication for installing on the secondary poller.

It shouldn't. It should only suppress the alerts for which you add the suppression condition.

Thanks for the feedback, Daniel!