jmayrand

Agreed... This looks really good. Already forwarded to our security group to review.

Jiri, Thanks for following up on this. Definetly need more auditing of transactions occuring in the system. View changes, Alert changes, Monitor enablement. All things things are good when the business asks who did what and why didnt it work. Thanks! Jeff

In reading my response I agree I did not answer what you were saying. But I think we agree on one thing and that is we should not have to implicitly tell an alert to ignore maintenance items that behavior should be OOB. We have been going through all our alert rules to add this that if in maintenance do not process the…

Yes we did. We have been running hybrid for a while now. We are also getting ready to upgrade to NTA 4.4 which means the Netflow data will be moved out to the cloud as well since 4.4 moves this to SQL instead of the disk based database. Overall though it has been working well. We use express route to connect to Azure for…

I agree on this. If a node is set into maintenance the business rules on the backend should remove the active alerts not just block future alerts. Seems like a simple feature request to me. We are dealing with this quite a bit. But again not knowing the original design intentions there could be a reason why SolarWinds…

Take a look at this... Blue typically means Maintenance... Status Indicators

How about Ansible?