cobrien1

The beta agreement prevents users from sharing details about the beta. The goal is a healthy one: prevent SolarWinds from trying to sell people who are not current customers a product based on a promise of features that may or may not be delivered some time in the future. If you'd like to see more about the beta, you'll…

Aha, that makes sense. Thanks for the additional clarification. There are no plans around account management permissions that we're prepared to announce.

The NPM team is not working on any SAM improvements You may want to check out the SAM WWWO: What We're Working On Beyond SAM 6.2 (Updated August 23, 2015)

Great feedback. Thanks.

This post can shed some light on why you're not getting all the juicy details you want, even if it's not a satisfying answer: Fear and Loathing of Roadmaps: Why your PM won’t give you a date

Yes. You're looking for audit logs. Go to the Home > Message Center tab, select only "Show Audit Events" at the bottom, and click Apply. Deleted nodes look like this:

NTM can indeed map many (but of course not all) types of firewalls in your topology. Check out the demo!

I stand corrected.

Try this SQL query with new web based reporting: SELECT n.Location , wlap.Name , Clients.Dat , Clients.Clients FROM ( SELECT wlh.NodeId AS NodeId , wla.ID AS APId , Convert(DateTime,Floor(Cast((wlh.FirstUpdate) as Float)),0) AS Dat , COUNT(DISTINCT wlh.MACAddress) AS Clients FROM Wireless_ClientsHistory wlh INNER JOIN…

False positives as in NPM detecting some failure to connect even though the site connectivity seemed to be fine? If that's what you mean, I've seen that many times and have always solved it by investigating the gap between what is telling me the site is up and what NPM is seeing. For example, rather than testing that the…

There is not currently.

You may find this interesting: http://techfieldday.com/video/solarwinds-inside-the-lab-netpath/ For simple availability check from globally dispersed locations, check out www.pingdom.com

Based on the lack of response, I take it everyone is relatively happy with the level of visibility we currently provide into F5s? Anyone care to confirm?

I understand you're asking the rest of the community how they were able to get LEM working in their environment, but I'd be very interested to know what documentation you feel is lacking or missing completely. Also, I'd be happy to help you get started with LEM if you'd like. Shoot me a message if you're interested and…

One of the best ways I've found to monitor VPN tunnels is not to try to directly monitor the up/down status of the tunnel according to the device terminating the tunnel but instead to monitor an infrastructure node on the other end of the tunnel so you can tell if real traffic can successfully traverse the tunnel. This…

Unfortunately we weren't able to come up with a work around. Note this data comes from UDT.

Interesting thought. Definitely that functionality is not currently provided OOTB. Let me see what we can come up with for a work around. If we did have some form of wireless client history available OOTB, what would be useful for you to have? Assuming you'd ideally have more than this simple request, that is.

We've got what we need. Thanks very much though mrchesnutt​.

Thanks to everyone who has uploaded a walk! We've got enough so I'm going to remove the sticky/featured content flag on this post.

We've gotten a couple walks but need many more. Remember: uploading walks now ensures what we're building is compatible with your gear!

I've responded to your PM. Thanks for helping us make our customers more secure. For posterity's sake, here's the info online: SolarWinds - Security Information

Question 1: Do you have Network Atlas installed on the same machine as NTM? Question 2: If multiple links are present, multiple links are shown. If you prefer the other way, you could always delete the offending links and run connect now between the two nodes to get the one link again. Although the most important…

The red dashes are telling you that we don't have topology information connecting the two nodes. Currently, that prevents link utilization from being displayed. Your best bet in the near term is to get topology polling between the two nodes working. Are both nodes under your control (in other words, not your ISP or another…

I think we'd like to provide deeper visibility into etherchannels. What would you like to see specifically in NPM? By the way, have you seen the etherchannel stuff here?: NTM 2.2 Beta1 - Building a Better Network Diagram Tool

I'm afraid this is not currently possible. There are a number of ways I could envision that working. Import for excel or csv is one way, or even importing from IPAM. Thoughts?

Each model and each software version of WLC can expose wireless details in a different way. If Cisco comes out with a new software release next week, it could expose wireless details in a completely different way. That makes it difficult to say we support 100% a set of controllers. However, I can tell you we have tested…

In an ideal world, how would you like to see it setup?

The configuration file edit is still the only way to disable the breadcrumbs. I understood that's just a quick and dirty fix. It seems to me that the next step, given we have a quick and dirty fix, would be to solve the real security problem (showing data users shouldn't have access to in the breadcrumbs) rather than…

This should help: https://support.solarwinds.com/Success_Center/Network_Performance_Monitor_(NPM)/NetPath_graph_issue_Missing_all_intermed…

Hot fixes and service releases are certainly important to us. We released 9 hotfixes for NPM 10.7, as you mentioned. I'm not sure there is any official process to hot fixes or service releases. We weigh situations as they come and try to make the best decision for our customers. It sounds like in this case it would have…