cobrien1

This sounds like a good idea to me. If you believe in it, make a feature request: Network Performance Monitor Feature Requests

The user is noted in the message of the screenshot I provided. In my case it was "admin", but assuming each of your users has a separate login, it would be their unique username.

Sorry for the delay sir. An NTM specific SE should reach out to you Monday or Tuesday regarding your case.

Apologies, I was out of vacation. The text walk will help, but won't be able to go through automated testing. Upload and we'll make the most of it. Thanks!

The old wisdom to always hardset speed and duplex may no longer apply in the gigabit ethernet world. Greg Ferro wrote a great article about this: http://etherealmind.com/ethernet-autonegotiation-works-why-how-standard-should-be-set/

I was thinking of bigger changes like showing a preview of resources to choose from and so forth. It sounds like your frustration is simply with search indexing. When you say "interactive", you're meaning the non-classic style charts? Classic charts are specifically notated as such but interactive charts, being the new…

This will require some deeper troubleshooting. I'd like to get the diagnostic file to look into. Are you able to open a ticket on this and provide me with the ticket number?

Can you provide a sanitized screenshot highlighting what is unexpected?

Question 1: Yup. You need to be able to open the NTM and Atlas applications on the same computer. Atlas doesn't have to be on your NPM server though, and also isn't separately licensed. Why not just install another copy of Atlas wherever you have NTM installed? Question 2: Understood. I suppose in this case it's a…

Next time I should read and comprehend before responding... As you said, 1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.10 is net-snmp's sysOID on Linux boxes so it would not be appropriate to use it for identification of F5. I'm afraid the manufacturer (F5 in this case) will need to use a SysOID that is not already in use by another manufacturer…

I agree the auto-layout tools don't do as well once you get too many nodes. You can use the manual layout shortcuts to help. I actually love those, but obviously they take more time. I'm curious, how many nodes you're trying to place on your maps? I've noticed that since NTM makes it fantastically simple to add nodes to…

I agree the behavior is not very useful. I think it's just a matter of fact that behind the scenes it is the system account performing the function as a result of the network sonar discovery and we did not reassign the action to the user who logged in to start the network sonar scan. I hate to think this would take years…

What specifically would you like to monitor or accomplish?

Good point.

Any differences in the transit to the first L3 hop (including the first L2 segment, as you're talking about) should not impact the performance numbers NetPath provides for the last hop. Out of curiosity, are the min, median, and max latency values for the endpoint within 20% of each other or do they very wildly? I suspect…

I don't have an ETA for the ETA. For better (and worse), this is a trending issue we're fixing with high priority.

Got it. Will keep tabs.

Got it. Will keep tabs.

When you're on the path page, append ?debug to the URL. Scroll down and click through the tabs to find some extra data. One thing you can review is the latency of individual paths that contribute to the multipath. That may help. If that doesn't get you what you need, I'd suggest a Wireshark on the probe to prove the…

This is not currently possible. It's something I'm thinking about but I do not have more to share at the moment. Thanks for the input!

This is what I'd do. It'd be nice to show a view based on data availability rather than capability. I'll have to think through that.

We don't do flow in NPM. Pinging jreves​, PM of NTA to speak to this point.

Thanks Bill!

Thanks familyofcrowes​. Much appreciated!

We don't see this often. We'd love to take a look at your environment. Would you be able to create a ticket so we can investigate?

Sounds like a different issue. Support ticket is probably the best route. Could you provide your ticket number for tracking?

Joe, thanks for the latest set of diags. We've got your case with dev right now for deeper investigation. I apologize for the inconvenience.

Richard Letts wrote: But you are not delivering on the 'progressing on old content' and that is what is bother your users I'd like to understand your view specifically better. Do you believe this is true of NPM, or UDT, or all Orion tools?

Interesting idea. Let me give it some thought.

Most bugs apply in specific scenarios and so are published internally for Support and tracking, but not externally. More common bugs are documented in KBs so you find solutions when you google the problem. KBs generally include work arounds and/or the version that includes the fix.