borgan · SolarWinds Engineer - Service Delivery

Any chance the feature will be adopted in the other product Admin guides? It is a much appreciated feature!

Yes please.

With more and more large customers with multiple apps and polling engines, this is a much needed feature in order to know the true impact of moving nodes between PEs. Those nodes are likely to have applications attached, be flow sources, SLAs, transactions associated, etc.

Yes please.

Absolutely Yes.

Anyone?

I am still looking for help with this report. I tried the suggestion of using the IPAM All Subnets report, but there is no way that I can see to add the name of the Pollin Engine to the report. Furthermore, once I am able to get the polling engine added, I would really like to also show the total number of IP addresses…

Anyone please?

Anyone?

Anyone?

Can you give more specifics as to how this was resolved. I am still seeing vulnerabilities for firmware versions that are no longer in use on my devices. Why does the report show vulnerabilities that are not correct?

I do not claim to be an expert on that question, so I will defer to anyone else with expertise on that aspect of things. Glad I could help.

Look at this as well. https://documentation.solarwinds.com/en/success_center/nta/content/nta-no-template-error-sw1469.htm

It would seem so. See if this helps. https://thwack.solarwinds.com/product-forums/netflow-traffic-analyzer-nta/f/forum/25720/netlfow-configuration-for-cisco-c9500-40x

Good, but I was referring to the Last 25 Traffic Analyzer Events widget. Do you see mention of the device name and what might have been done with any data received at the server?

Do you see any events on the NTA Summary page that mention the device name?

I don't believe that you will be able to get only one alert if the Trigger is based on Harware Sensor since each sensor is a unique entity in the database. You could get around this by creating a Group of the sensors on each node than alerting off Group Member Status and including a list of the sensors that were in alarm…

I seem to see the same behavior. Once I got the widget to appear, I can add or delete the UPS option in List Resources and the PCU Status widget is not affected. Yep, seems like a bug to me.

Anyone?

I think we may be comparing apples to oranges so to speak. You say that availability reports include data for periods when alerts are muted - which is to be expected since the nodes are being polled during those times but no alerts can trigger. I have tested and determined that time periods when nodes are "unmanaged" are…

Is there any reason why the ViewExporter script would not work for Platform 2017 views to be imported into a new 2022.3 or 2022.4 instance?

Oh, and this looks like it is for Arrays rather than Pools. Am I correct?

Thank you jm_sysadmin. I assume this query is in lieu of actually changing the projected runout value in the widget - which apparently is not possible. Right?

Actually, I just realized that this must be a calculated value. The real questions then is how can I generate reports and/or alerts that show Pools that have a projected capacity runout of less than 3 months?

I have actually thought about this one myself. Would like to see if anyone has an idea.

Awww, come on. Anyone have a thought?

But what login method are you using for your 9336C devices?

Try this in the SWQL query: SELECT TOP 100 n.Caption, n.Status FROM Orion.Nodes n WHERE Caption Not LIKE '%PRN%'

Exactly what I was needing. Thanks.

Yes, thank you. I was aware of that, but I believe there are certain functionalities (e.g. world map) that will not function unless certain URLs can be reached. I'm not talking about a total prohibition for external access, but merely limiting it to known and needed URLs. Am I wrong about this?