aLTeReGo ✭✭✭✭✭

Comments

  • The documentation makes reference to a "Target Node". In this case it's the SAM server itself, though in some cases you may be able to pass remote parameters to an external network host. E.G. If you were to write a VBScript that connects to a remote web server and logs in to a web interface using Forms Authentication.…
  • This definitely sounds permissions related, though it's difficult to determine that definitively without additional information. I would suggest looking through the Event Log of the monitored host immediately after a test polling once you've received that error. An event log message may shed some light on where the problem…
  • This should not be happening. I suspect a restart of services will resolve the issue, but this is not at all something you should need to do. I would recommend opening a case with support to troubleshoot this issue. They will likely request diagnostics to help isolate the issue.
  • Agreed. I would recommend placing this particular application into debug mode and gathering a diagnostic immediately after receiving the next error from that monitored application. From those diagnostics we should have a much better idea what is cause of these false positives.
  • We're running an Avaya G3R with Avaya S8700 servers. Our off campus PBX connectivity is PRI, but we use SIP to connect to our Avaya conference bridge. We're also running VoIP handsets, in addition to more traditional digital and analog sets. We're also using PRI to interconnect our Avaya G3R with our Cisco Call Manager.…
  • Depending on how important this is to your organization you always have the option of contacting Microsoft Support. They may be a little pricey at $250.00 an indecent, but they guarantee your issue is resolved or your money back.
  • The Linux/Unix script monitors open a remote session to the host via SSH and execute on the selected host. Vbscript is executed locally on the Orion server, or additional poller that the node is associated with. Remote execution isn't possible via vbscript. If you need to execute a script remotely on a Windows host you…
  • Is there any historical statistic collection occurring on these volumes? E.G. if you go to the Volume Details view do the charts have data? If not then it may be related to volume changes occurring within the environment which is causing the SNMP index number to change. For Windows hosts I would suggest changing the…
  • Sounds like you're on an older version of Red Hat. Try the following command instead # up2date -v -u net-snmp-utils net-snmp
  • Most noticeably absent from your list of MIBs is the HOST-RESOURCES-MIB which exposes all processes running on the host via SNMP, and what SAM's Browse For Component Monitors via SNMP leverages.
  • The alternative as sean.martinez‌ suggested is to use AppInsight for SQL. It's limited to 50 component licenses regardless of the total number of actual used components.
  • Yes, this is one of the major features of IP Address Manager as pictured below.
  • SAM's SSL Certificate Expiration Date Monitor is not dependant upon IIS, but it does assume a web service of some sort or type is running at the remote end. What kind of certificate is it that you're trying to monitor?
  • The Multi-Chart is supported only by Server & Application Monitor and Virtualization Manager (as seen here). I suggest creating a feature request for NPM to also support the Multi-Chart resource.
  • amrita1690 wrote: Can you please also help with the difference in the HTTP and HTTPS Monitor. I think the difference is only with the type of URL to be monitored, if its an https URL then we can use HTTPS monitor and HTTP monitor otherwise. That is correct. That is really the only difference. However, I could see the HTTPS…
  • MA * McScript.exe * naPrdMgr.exe * FrameworkService.exe VSE * Mcshield.exe * VsTskMgr.exe * mfeann.exe
  • We are working on some significant performance improvements for Network Atlas maps that should be included in a future release, though based on the messages you're seeing I can't say for certain that the issue is the same. I would recommend opening a case with support so they can take a closer look at your diagnostics. 
  • It has not. We are tracking this internally under case WPM-128. The only workaround I can think of would be to create a DML trigger on the appropriate WPM table.
  • When creating the custom property was the option for "Reports" selected?
  • The Agent update/upgrade process has been significantly overhauled in the SAM 6.3 release (currently in beta) so you should not expect similar issues in the future when upgrading.
  • When changing the nodes polling method it is not possible to retain historical statistics for volumes and interfaces because there is no constant and reliable way to accurately map SNMP index IDs to WMI properties, or vice versa.
  • Thanks efosshaug. This MIB walk looks perfect. If you or anyone else in the community are willing to share more MIB walks of IBM Servers with MegaRAID software installed they would be much appreciated. We don't usually like to implement a feature around one or even two customer submitted MIB walks. Differences in MegaRAID…
  • can you add the view filter "udp.port == 514" to WireShark and then log into the Cat6500 and write the changes to the configuration. Even if there are not changes that need to be saved it should still generate a syslog message and sent that to the Orion server.
  • The DAG should be a property of the application, rather than the individual mailbox database.
  • The longer you've gone without maintenance succeeding, the longer it will take maintenance to catch up.
  • Indeed the Agent does publish Windows Performance Counters related to the health and performance of the agent itself for troubleshooting purposes. Those counters are however removed as a result of uninstalling the agent.
  • chadsikorra wrote: aLTeReGo ,Has this actually been fixed in a later release? We'd love to start using this feature but ran into this issue and had to turn it off. This issue should now be resolved. jvb​ may have some additional insight as to the oldest version containing that fix.
  • In APM 4.2 we added the ability to return a string value in addition to the numerical statistic for the database user experience monitors. This string value is shown in the "Messages" field of the component monitor. There's an example of this in the "SQL Server 2005-2008 Performance (SQL)" application template for the…
  • Not beyond the methods described above.
  • WMI is more akin to SNMP rather than FTP. Each request for some piece of information is a query that requires a challenge and response. In the case of SNMP that is usually an SNMP community string (shared secret) or credentials in the case of SNMPv3. For WMI this is a Windows username and password. This is very much unlike…