MoonLight

Any news?

Finally I completed the HF2 installation. On the MPE, the install failed at the end of configuration wizard with following message: Configuring database components for plugins FAILED Database configuration failed: • Error while executing script- dbm_AggregateData_part: dbm_AggregateTimeSerie_part: ALTER TABLE SWITCH…

Hi fletchmasta, so how did it goes for you? I have the same question, and it might be the reason the NTA keep on failing on the new server.

I went through the logs, and it appears that the NTA is the reason. NTA failed to start, it looks like that it cannot get the correct configuration. I have the NetFlow Storage on separate server, but from the logs it seems that the storage server wasn't recognized at all.

Voted up for ability for option to select which custom properties can be showed in the popover.

Hi, if I use this method without plan to keep/purchase High Availability, will the "High Availability license expired" show up in the banner and license manager? Or will it be gone once the HA disabled per last step? Thank you

Hi, no, i don't have ticket open unfortunately, i'm rolling back the migration, and everything is back to before the attempt. I saved the logs folder somewhere else though. As for the NTA, we are still on 4.2.3. I'm planning to do the NTA upgrade after the OS migration. Also one question about this article, for this…

So I finally completed my migration last week, and today the upgrade to 2019.2. It's been a long journey but I'm happy now that it's over. I did it the "old fashion" though as I didn't have time to tinker further. I'm pretty certain it's working if I have no NTA 4.2.3, and will probably work if i spend more time tinkering…

So I tried it today but I cannot failover to the new server, it's keep on failing back to the old one. I believe I followed the guide to the letter, but maybe I overlooked something like HA requirement (SolarWinds High Availability requirements ). Do we need to follow all that? My goal is strictly to migrate the engines to…

I have the same question and don't have the solution unfortunately. When calling the script through the alert action, the script will always run from the main poller. What I end up doing is a way around using powershell invoke-command to run the script remotely. I guess this will need to be a feature enhancement request to…

So from MS tech support, they confirmed that there are no solution for the "RDP user experience" monitor. The closest thing that they suggest is to do the windows log event monitor. There is a SAM template that apparently covers this "Windows Remote Desktop Services (Session Host Role)". I guess I'm going with that as…

Yes, we do need to have the " SolarWinds Alert Integration" from ServiceNow App/Store to be enabled/installed in ServiceNow. I believe this KB has all the details: support.solarwinds.com/.../How-to-Integrate-ServiceNow-with-the-Orion-Platform-Video

It seems that's the only option. I also have ticket open with MS to see what their solution for this. I'll post here if I get anything useful.

Awesome, thank for your detailed information, that's really helpful. 

I'm on the same boat here :) I have the exact same question on what node it should be assigned to. In general I think we need to setup a new node for different services. For o365 I think we can simply assign it to node "office.com" or something like that, and use that for all O365 monitoring from service health, outlook,…

One of the thing that I'm not sure is where I should assign the template. We have multiple SQL instances in multiple different resource groups (RGs) for different dept/groups. For granularity, I think I'll at least assign the template to one node that represent one RGs, or perhaps setup one node for each SQL server of the…

That makes sense, I'm thinking to go for that combination: T-SQL queries component and PowerShell queries to get the DB metrics from Azure SQL instance.

Yes, I wish SolarWinds show us the hash for the files. I got the same MD5 hash value: 21C6CF6B91663F5E04D70E9B8C20CDC9 And this is the SHA256 value: 60965E20D1ED49E5A10046BCE6550AA63D5D3378F1B8CF10275AA6937FCDD93E I got the file scanned using 3 different tools, and all 3 reported clean result.

Switching poll to SNMP doesn't seem a good option for me as it appears that means we'll lose some other monitoring. Also I just learned that we had turned off SNMP for all Win servers a while back.

Thank you, and yes it is Windows. I checked with our HW SME, and we do have Dell OpenManage in the box. I have ticket open and been informed that I must change the poll to SNMP as Dell doesn't provide array and disk health through WMI…

Sorry for the long response, this looks promising. Is this going to work for numWorkerProcesses more than 1? I'm thinking if I need to propose to purchase additional terminal service license, but I don't know if this will work for numWorkerProcesses >1. I've tested to set it to two, but see the same issues once it set to…

Ugh - hopefully it get fix soon. It affected some of our important monitors, the way it is now, it's impossible to enable the monitor to those affected.

Hey Nathan, we had the exact same issues with the login, and it solved by using the XY coordinates as you mentioned. However we experienced intermittent site down issue with o365, the o365 page itself is working, but the transaction shows as down in WPM playback. Do you encounter the similar case as well? Thank you

I didn't check the page (About WPM Recorders ) before, and just realized that WPM 3.0 has yet to support LDAP/NTLM authentication. Any news on when this functionality will be added? Most of our transactions that's currently having problem is using NTLM/SSO authentication. Thank you

Do you have expected release date? We have long outstanding issues with WPM playback (WPM Playback Intermittently Down ), and it seems it will need a new release for the solution, particularly independent browser or would be best if we can select browser for the playback.

Be careful when using XY recording, always use either image verification or text verification, I believe XY does not care if page is successfully loaded or if the click is executed on the correct element, so verification is crucial on XY mode.