DSchratwieser

Comments

  • Mav, I just want to confirm the feature request is for SuperScope. Supernet is another DHCP configuration possibly worth considering as well but my need is to recognize non-contiguous subnetworks as members of a single SuperScope sharing the total IP base minus exclusions configured in each member sub network. Kind…
    in Who wants better IPAM importing? Comment by DSchratwieser August 2011
  • Mav, The SuperScopes are part of a large range of blocks bought in using the discovery process when the first Windows DHCP server was added. DHCP sees the blocks as members of the respective SuperScope but IPAM appears to see them as individual /24s. Case in point, the following are four blocks for the office in question…
    in Who wants better IPAM importing? Comment by DSchratwieser August 2011
  • Mav, I had submitted an enhancement months ago for Superscopes rather than Supernets. As I reported at the time I see Netblocks showing critical when the Superscope itself clearly has well over 50% free address space. MS DHCP allows the building of Superscopes IPAM does not allow the monitoring as a single block of…
    in Who wants better IPAM importing? Comment by DSchratwieser January 2012
  • I have been trying to suggest the inclusion of SuperScope monitoring for a few months now. I have several SuperScopes in a large office but continually see the individual /24s at or near capacity. When I look at the MS DHCP server this is obviously not the case. Is this functionality under considieration? Regards
    in Who wants better IPAM importing? Comment by DSchratwieser August 2011
Avatar