solarwooky

I use a custom field called critical. With custom fields you can get really flexible in identification of nodes with custom criteria.

Here is my challenge, and help me if I see this wrong... If UDT can see any given user endpoint and make an intelligent association to identify the end device. Why can't it do the same for Access points? If you look closely, UDT is very talented at identifying end devices with the exception of Access points, which causes…

Couldn't you accomplish this with "Custom Properties"? I would create a custom property called Criticality or Impact or Stars or whatever meaningful moniker. Then you can create a rule based on a custom property which says if "Custom Property 'Criticality' is Greater than or equal to 4" AND ("Node is not equal to UP" OR…

Thanks for the support. I may have to just submit this idea again. if it is not re-opened.

">michal.hrncirik I fail to see how "subviews" will cover what I described in the idea. Please re-open the idea and expound in detail, as I did above, how subviews addresses the idea I have put forth. Especially, given the fact that subviews are NOT menu driven navigation but child views of a parent view. The largest…

Why is this closed?????? This customization is NOT covered via "subviews"!!!! Not even close. Yes subviews is helpful and a welcome feature but far from the feature request I submitted. The limitation of sub-views lies in the fact that you MUST be in the view to get to a sub-view. Sub-views is not a menu hierarchy for…

We really need more robust groups.

In whatever resource you use in the Top Ten dashboard, edit the resource and use a SQL query to filter nodes with Custome Property "Criticality" which is greater than 4. So in the resource any item which meets the resources criteria and it has a criticality of 5 will appear. For example: I would: * Create the Custom…

I would think it would be a great improvement to focus on the new Wireless feature. Some information is omitted from the Wireless views but I don't see a technical reason why. Why are the Machine Types for Access points listed as the controller? Things such as this.

Whats under the Chassis expanded list for HP C7000? You expanded all but the Chassis option. Are you showing blade information?

Sitll nothing??? HELP

This is what i'm getting in my email on reset: ${SQL:Select Floor(Convert(float,(getdate()-TriggerTimeStamp))) from [AlertStatus] inner join [AlertDefinitions] on [AlertDefinitions].[AlertDefID] = [AlertStatus].[AlertDefID] and [ActiveObject] = '$@NetObjectID@' and [ObjectName] = '$@NetObjectName@' and…

All i'm getting is the SQL syntax error. Here is my workaround: Top 25 Errors Today Report Top 10 Errors This Hour by Node (Web Only Report) Top 10 Errors Today by Node (Web Only Report) I still would like to do it with the Errors & Discards resource.

Any idea on how to get this to work in NPM 10.4 on the web interface. In the "Filter Nodes (SQL)" of a node. I want to use the errors and discards resource on a single node dynamically.

Aha. Just what I was looking for. Missed that one. I'll have a look at SAM 6.0 beta and give it a test run on a dev box somewhere. Thanks ">aLTeReGo

Forgive me, but i'm using View Limitations based on the options NPM is presenting. Its not like i'm trying to use it in a custom manner. When I click on Edit View Limitations, among the options i'm presented are: Single Group Limit the Account to a Single Group Group of Groups Limit the Account to a group of selected…

Did you get a resolution to the ASN.1 error? I'm getting this too.

Yes this is blinking on my radar. I'll create a feature request with something like this: Idea to apply views by Group. Each group can have a different view, and not just the same "Group Details view"

My issues with the aLTeReGo's Exchange 2010 Database Availability Group (Without Management Tools) Template. What to put in “Script Arguments:” for “Status of database copies” component? The field mask hint is “target_server,type_exchange_database_here” so do I put “exmb01,db1” or “excas01,db1” or…

I am getting this same condition in my environment. Windows Server 2008 R2 X64 on Classic MIB Walk. What is the cause of this error?

When I create a Summary View and add the resource "All Nodes - Tree (AJAX)", then create a View Limitation using "Single Group", and select the group. The expectation is the view would now be constrained to the View Limitation I imposed. However, nothing is constrained, and All Nodes are still displayed. Which implies that…

I'm getting a blank report.

How do I get the query to Alert in Alert Manager?

sean.martinez here is what I did to get around this single node dynamic query issue. I created 3 Advanced SQL reports in Report Writer, 2 of which directly address the challenge but do not resolve the overall inquiry. I created the reports based on the report from RichardLetts Top 25 Errors This Hour report. Here they are:…

View limitations are unreliable in NPM 10.4

Sean You said "NPM does not allow one node to have multiple interfaces". Is this coming up in the future? Or should I go a head and put in the Feature request.

With a simple DISTINCT I eliminated duplicates. This is what I finally got: SELECT DISTINCT Nodes.NodeID AS NodeID, Nodes.Caption AS NodeName, Nodes.VendorIcon AS Vendor_Icon, Nodes.IP_Address AS IP_Address, Nodes.MachineType AS Machine_Type, CustomPollerLabels.Label, Interfaces.Critical_Interface,…

Does Solarwinds know this and do they plan on correcting this for accurate monitoring.

In my case it was not harmless behavior because the Applications monitors stopped working. So the evidence did not point to a counter error as you can see in the attached file of the original post.

Ok. So I restarted the job engine V2 service and that cleared out the counters and the issue. The issue was that, none of the Application monitors were polling. Which is what prompted me to check the performance counters and I found the Job Engine V2 Jobs queue way out of wack. I'll open up a case and get to the bottom of…