rharland2012

Hey, I didn't write anything bad!!!

And before I get fact-checked - yes, I read the thread, and yes, I know Netflow isn't real-time. That's why I said future-date. Perhaps we're talking different mechanisms five-ten years from now.

Mr. Ego - just a quick question for you - is it possible to specify the name of the application pool while using the 'taken from alert trigger' option? The app pool restart works perfectly, but the app pool I want to restart isn't the DefaultAppPool. I'm not sure if the alert knows enough about the process to correctly…

Any better results with hotfix 3, or are you still encountering this issue?

Okay. Replication attempt time, then. Restart the snmpd daemon on one of the problem hosts and verify that you get the bogus reboot alert. Just a sanity check - I'm very close to sure this will in fact trigger the reboot alert on the next poll. When I walk to 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.1.1 (the UnDP referred to in your original post)…

Yes, I do....I do. WE HAVE TO GO BAAAACK...

Brandon, thank you. Have you noticed what kind of bandwidth the Solarwinds-specific traffic generates on these links?

I know this is an old thread, but is this still the mechanism for dependency checking? Thanks for any info.

ttl wrote: Can we all agree to let this thread die the death it should have died a long time ago? Are you, like....KIDDING ME?!!!!

Peter Krutý , thanks much for your reply. Unfortunately, I don't think there's much one could do - short of adding functionality to allow recording of form submission and input in a Silverlight site - that would fix this problem. It's not so much a problem with WPM as a limitation. If you look at my other post regarding…

It's not 'impossible' to get RO SNMP or traps from a carrier's router if you're a customer. We were roped into a 'managed' MPLS offering some years ago and I have RO access, netflow, and traps sent to my collector. I engaged our account team, we had a technical discussion about our needs, and it happened. Have you asked…

Perhaps that explains it....I'm on 2.0.1.

Seconding Phil's priority list...education could be huge. Think of all the highly customized, highly usable solutions so many of our fellow forum members have architected and put in place to increase the value of the Solarwinds suite for their organizations. Presentations, demonstrations, or how-tos from some of the folks…

Still radio silence on my case, unfortunately. I haven't had an update in two days - that's never good.

Thank you!

I'm still missing something - getting barked at on testing it with Get Output Failed: Can't identify dynamic column definitions from script output... I'll keep at it...gotta be something small. Thanks.

Thank you - I'll give that a try!

If you've built dependencies with the switch/router as the parent and the host among the children, then it will show as unavailable and will not generate alerts. As long as the router/switch down state is discovered first, of course.

I don't know if this will help you, but this has happened once to us since moving to 3.3 - and the correlating factor I saw was that the switches that lost their port monitoring in UDT were in a facility that suffered an extended power outage - say three or four days. When the switches powered back up, the ports were…

Hi there - I finally upgraded this past week to 11.5.1. No problems to report - not sure if I was surprised or not, but that's a good result. Our dataset isn't as big as yours - so I won't pretend to speak to that. Alert-wise, the migration seemed to work well. It feels a little unusual to not have the Advanced Alert…

No apologies necessary - happy to assist where I'm able. The second-to-last decimal refers to the interface. I did not experience the exportation stop that you refer to....I read all about it and expected it, but it never came. I think it's possible that this issue may have been resolved in later revs of code.

There are a few possibilities here. First, I would attempt to see if the response truly times out from the polling server during alert - just ping the VM or host in question and find out if it's truly not responding. Re backup - if the same symptom surfaces during backup windows, then that could be a couple of things, too.…

Whatever works!

Yes, you can. If you define IP Address Groups in NTA to match your tenant /24s, then you'll at least be able to do an ad-hoc NTA report/view showing total bytes in a month for the desired subnet of choice.

Mine is located on my Node Details page - see attached image. It's on the left-hand column there. This is under the 'Customize Page' option on the Node Details page. If it's not already there, you can add this to your details page as well. This implies that you are polling the device in question to pull hardware…

I'm assuming so, but I cannot say for sure. Perhaps a Solarwinds source can give you that information. mrs.alterego‌, might you be able to ping a SW resource to get confirmation on Don's question?

We could also send The Bishop to take care of this gamification-gaming ne'er-do-well.... The Bishop - Monty Python's Flying Circus - YouTube

Unless you specified a seed router (see attached image), it shouldn't auto-populate. Can you show the ranges (with identifying octets scrubbed out, of course)? I don't see a logical way that non-specified subnets/ranges would include things you didn't define.

You'll have a hard time finding unbiased feature-feature comparisons, I think. Are there specific features that you want to verify exist on the platforms? That might make your task easier. It requires time, but I feel the best way to compare the two is to run trial installations and get some data to work with.

Maybe you could do a 30-day trial to capture the metrics needed and then do the sell AFTER the fact to guarantee prevention of future bottleneck-inducing architectural decisions!