nickzourdos ✭✭✭✭✭

What version of UDT are you running? Can you post a screenshot of your Port Management page in UDT so we can verify that you have the node and ports managed? It should look like this:

The first step in the "Migrate your product to the new server" section of the migration guide is to backup your legacy report writer files. If this was not done you will need to retrieve them from backups of your old system. Otherwise, you will need to rebuild these reports in the new report engine.

Correct, and I actually just read that they're also looking for both views I assumed this was a UX session in response to the feedback regarding the Active Alerts resource taking up so much space.

Yes, I would ask to see if they can send you buddy drop 29280 for UDT 3.2.4 It worked like a charm!

This actually sounds familiar. I think I had this same issue, I would double check with support to see if it's a recognized bug.

I might have to throw this one back to zackm​ since is he a SWQL/SDK master, but what you're looking for would require a script to count the total number of managed switchports on a device (which may be tricky if you don't want to include VLAN interfaces, etc.), grab the status of each port, and do some quick math in order…

Keep us posted!

It certainly is quite the surprise when you come into the office and SolarWinds is completely out of licensing or all your polling rates have been knocked back.

I've created a group for each of our remote sites which contains all of the nodes for that site. I then assigned each cube one of those groups based on the site name. If the cube is yellow, there is one or more problems at that site. If the cube is red, the entire site is unreachable.

Awesome, thank you for the info!

That actually broke my web console Luckily I made a backup beforehand. After I restored it, this resource popped up! It has been intermittent in the past so let's hope it's here to stay!

Unfortunately we deployed our -X series ASA's without the FTD drives in them...

I've never used UDT's whitelist, I haven no use case in my environment. What you're doing sounds like a nightmare, though

Have you tried the steps outlined here, and also updated to the latest hotfix that was released on Friday?

This is the source of my issue as well, it's throwing a SQL connection error but the network and database are fine

Can you elaborate on the symptoms a bit more, and the resolution?

Can you include a screenshot?

Ah yes, I remember that now. Thanks for getting to the bottom of it and sharing the solution here

If we still had FTD in test I'd try to knock this out, but we decided against it for now. Wish I could be more help

Rob, I know this is from a while back, but can you confirm if the Procera MIBs are scheduled to be included in the next major release? We are unable to store historical data for traffic running through a critical part of our core network. Thanks, - Nick

Yes, the betas typically use a local database since the instance (probably) won't get large enough to warrant a dedicated SQL server. You do have the option of installing a beta with a dedicated database, though. Just blow away the beta VM when you're done.

Can you elaborate? My web console is also painfully slow...

It is available to me in Orion 2018.2 HF6, I do not have EOC

You will need to enable and configure SNMP on the B6000, then you can add it to NPM using that community string

A few points: - You're working with a legacy device that's no longer supported by Cisco - The configuration requirements may vary depending on which version of software you're running - On the ASA platform you're actually working with NSEL instead of Netflow - If you have access to ASDM this is much easier If you've…

Somehow pasting the URL removed the colon between http://, fixed!

Can you post that file here? I did a quick search on THWACK and don't see it.

I've hit a speedbump. The Test Node is automatically changed to the node that the application template is assigned to, in this case the application server. Since the application server is not hosting the database the test fails. I am using a SQL Experiencing Monitor instead of ODBC.

This looks much different than the report from your original post, which is what I wrote the query for. What is the data in the second column, is it a port description?

Hi John, Are you missing polls to your new 6800? I can't seem to get SolarWinds to behave....