mikeit83

The only walk you should be doing on a Hauwei device is out the door. Just saying. 

We have believe we have 125-150+ locations reporting back netflow data. Message me if you need data.

Sure- do you want to do it on prod or stand up a test environment? Like I said, if we have reasonable faith of stable execution Im fine with doing prod (as we can snap back if needed.)

Thanks sir! I am possibly going to give it a swing sometime this weekend. I am REALLY looking forward to the centralized upgrades so I dont have to bounce around to all of the other servers

I think you may benefit from more constructive feedback about your issues. Solarwinds and their techs (I do not work for them) are pretty aware of the issues surrounding the last update. It taught many of us, myself included, to do the following: 1. Always make snapshots of everything before upgrading. 2. NEVER deploy…

can we get checkpoint firewalls put on the roadmap, please? Would also like to see: aruba wireless a10 load balancers

Fair enough. Is there a way to re-order customer properties? We created a role type customer property (edge router, edge switch, core router, core switch). I started using the mandatory field, and wanted to re-arrange them- and like you did above, put an unassigned group as the default so they would have to pick one…

Josh- I see what you are talking about. (adding the custom interface property for WAN interfaces). However, is there a way to make this more streamlined to where my peers are forced to indicate which interface is the wan interface on routers and routers only? The only way I see to add this wan property is to manually go…

Maybe you can already do this with the existing product, but for routers, I would like some way to indicate which interface is the "WAN" or "INTERNET" interface up node addition. This will make it much easier to create reports without having to manually go into each node and pull the interface fort he reports.

Our company will be very excited to get our hands on this update! WPM was very useful to help figure out some issues with our new proxy and "the internet is slow." 

Done... As a note- most of our alerts and rules come from a super chatty device, or series of devices, blowing out the syslog or trap table and nuking performance.

We upgraded to latest greatest as of 6/10/2019. Be aware that the .net framework needs to be at 4.7.2 (its in the release notes). I believe the upgrade process tries to install it, but requires a reboot- and must have access to the internet (for whatever reason). Not all of our orion servers have access to solarwinds, so…

You can tell if NTA is installed by your Orion webpage. See if it has a "netflow" tab. If it does, you are in business. How to configure is open to interpretation. We use netflow v5 or 9 configurations. Here is a sample I use to quickly inject a router with netflow configs and then what I turn up on the interface. global…

I opened a TAC case, WOW... 2 minutes (literally) after I submitted it online- someone called me back. Turns out they changed some of the HTTP - > https logic and it was throwing the error. It corrected itself. All is well. Well don't SolarWinds dudes and dudettes.

We have the same issue. Question- do you have multiple pollers? It is only impacting one of our additional pollers. If we move the device to another poller- it works fine. We only encounter this error when we go to to "list resources". 

You have to keep in mind that "must exist for" logic has to be grounded in polling intervals. If you poll a device every 10 minutes- its a good idea to keep your must exist for as a multiple of 10. I usually have really sensitive mission critical polling done every 2 or 3 minutes. So I can get an alert if its down for 6…

We decided a while ago to not rely on any solarwinds info about EOL or EOS. We manually pulled and verified the dates from cisco.com and our SE and manually assigned them dates. We referenced the dates when linked with pictures and URL of where we got the data. But yes, it would be nice if that legwork was done by…

Im pretty sure you need to be SQL 2016 at a minimum. But yes, the upgrade adviser should let you know where it will blow up. Make sure you have good backups if you dont have a good test environment.

Anyone get their thwack points yet?

uploaded nexus 5596 and 7009

Serena- agreed, however, we mainly upgraded to get current on the OS level to support future solarwinds upgrades. There were some cool features introduced this time that we plan on using. My team is extremely happy with the current release. We did have some issues- but mostly it was because we tried doing the high…

Yet Solarwinds is wanting to deprecate 2012 R2 on the next release I had a tac case this weekend that the support guy was comparing .net versions- to they must be on the lookout for something. All of our servers are still 2012 with the exception of one APE that is now 2016.

I agree- we need to be able to give engineers the capability of upgrading IOS without ALSO having god rights to solarwinds. Providing admin NCM access doesnt allow the ability to do IOS upgrades.

We, too, had problem not showing users. It was not until we got the 10/20/2017 hotfix installed that it resolved this issue. We worked with TAC and some app engineers to help figure that one out a little.