michal.hrncirik

F5 interface polling is currently about polling of "real F5 interfaces" not interfaces of hosting machine. We are about to add a new MIB for this. Alerts you need are currently not part of that, but let me see if I can get if for you as custom SQL ones.

Hi Kieran, here are responses for your additional questions: 1) yes, we will ping every single IP that falls into given subnet (with ICMP and SNMP). 2) you may add that node and it will act as "down" in NPM. but you will still see traps in message center if you configure that node properly so it will send traps to NPM…

if you would use something like "IPAM - Last 1000 IP History records" in Orion report writer, would it be sufficient for your auditing purposes?

Hi Henrik, so instead more data sources for line chart you would like to have TOP XX resource for UnDP table poller data correct? If so, I'll add +1 for this feature we are currently tracking. thanks, Michal

Hey Mustafa, try to use Orion.Node.Vendor Like "cisco" and let me know if that helps or not.

IPAM uses DNS resolution as a primary tool for getting hostname. You may go ahead and create a feature request on our Ideation page. thanks, Michal

please open a support ticket for that. we would like to investigate. thanks, Michal

thanks guys. I updated our internal feature request.

Hi, yes you can use Solarwinds report writer to build "operation availability" report. Raw data for the Operation availability graph" are not supported now. thanks, Michal

thanks for sharing!

I can hear it clearly and loudly

Hi, ok, I can understand that. I'll add this as a feature request. The workaround could be obviously delete existing /24 subnets and then use IPAM subnet calculator to create /27 ones.

Hi lukeod, in case you already have a spreadsheet with all supernets you want to add and you have there a column that represents the group/location then IPAM 3.0 has a new importing feature - it can also import structures which seems to be something that resolve your problem. let me know if you need a help - I may jump…

You gave us great feedback Pete, it's appreciated. We are trying to collect more information regarding this specific requirement. Since we are speaking about totally new tool here we would like to hear more from the rest of the users if this is also something they miss. So please speak up and let us know if you are…

Hi TheG0at, I understand your problem and we are trying to collect all similar feedback like this to make the right decision for the future. Unfortunately our QA was not able to test all existing devices. We already have some feedback from RC phase and I may say that we are working on solution how to solve most painful…

nope it's 3rd party software

Hi Andrew, as we finishing current release I'd be interested to hear your point to improve for the future. Online webmeeting would be great. I'll contact you via email. thanks, Michal

hey guys, Yes, I can confirm that thank's to your feedback we've gotten during previous betas (which is very good we got it at that phase). We had to modify our polling mechanism in order to support PRI polling on devices like 3845 series. We had to solve that with Cisco first. However, we are almost at the end with the…

working on it right now...

Hi Don, could you send me your pcap from WLC device (that has some traffic with netflow on it)? We plan to add those WLCs with NBAR2 support.

thanks for coming back and report what caused this problem! Really appreciated. thanks, Michal

Hi secureadm, yes IPAM 3.0 now supports improved user delegation so you can create user and dedicated him just limited set of rights for a specific subnet.

other IPAM users, please speak up if you need such feature. I't important for us to hear your opinions.

just to be crystal clear - you would like to apply user delegation per column (not only per rows) correct?

ok, thanks for feedback

good, thanks

Hi Bilel, what do you mean by the consequences? IPSLA Manager uses exactly the same syntax as you would use directly through Cisco CLI.

No one has tried this? we are looking for UI feedback - your chance to tell us what you would like to change! thanks, Michal

Hi Frank, yes, it's part of IP address DNS records functionality. Feel free to subscribe for beta. thanks, Michal

Hi, first of all I apologize for issues you have with NCM. Regarding NPM & HW health. NPM does not modify HW health data from sensors. that means, what we got from device we show in our console. in your case it sounds confusing when you say that power supply status sensor reports critical but NPM shows warning. We…