fcaron

This issue is probably fixed by NCM 6.1 Hot Fix 1, available from your customer portal, in the support area. Let us know if this helped, if not, you should open a case

Abailey25, NCM 552 is certified on Windows 2003 R2. You should first verify your settings vs. section "Enabling Realtime Configuration Change Detection " of NCM's admin guide and if nothing is obvious, you should open case.

Rgward, Is this an acceptable solution? Are your intermediate nodes/hops managed (or at least known) by NPM Core?

Hi Delta, I'll contact you off-line to discuss these issues. Some might have existing workarounds or solutions coming in a short time frame.

same function in the Win32

Yes, we have seen your other posting there: http://thwack.solarwinds.com/thread/49342. Can you elaborate on why you are not using the possibility to define the download method (SSH/Telnet) per node? Or group of nodes (bulk change)?

Yes, opened it (137438). What do you think of using the same mechanism for allowing the Change Request Approval feature to send the requests to different approvers, based on the device. See H) in this http://thwack.solarwinds.com/message/169621#169621 Just realized you proposed this idea already there:…

Hello, you should receive the bits today

Hi, No, it's still there (the link above is correct, even in the new thwack). I'm not aware of any reason why it would not work in NCM 7. What symptoms are you experiencing, John?

Tks for your input. Adding one more vote to already existing requirement (9639). Not on the radar for now.

Got it, thanks Tim (99351) kbyrne@maximumasp.com, can you elaborate on your use case a bit more? What type of pollers, how many, deployed against what type of node... That wil help us treating this enhancement request with the appropriate priority

Have you tried playing with the terminal length command in order to try to get rid of teh "more"? On some devices, the syntax looks like this... <Command Name="RESET" Value="terminal length 1000" />

All, Thanks for your input. We hear you and are taking your input into account: we have released 7.0.1 that helps with some of the flexibility that NCM 7.0 reduced and have a 7.0.2 in preparation that continues along the same lines. As far as the speed of the intertace, this is something we hear quite often (as well as…

An additional point that is worth mentionning is that you can tag your IP SLA operations with the Type Of Service (TOS) byte (bit mask) to make sure the traffic generated by this operation is properly categorized by the CB QOS queuing mechanism (if this is what you mean by QOS). To do this, go to advanced screen in the IP…

Hi Rgward, Adding all your Custom Property input to what we already have in this area. We hear a lot about Custom Property Editor and I wanted to give you a bit more insight about why we have not made more progress on this, so far. The reason is that we have plans for moving the Custom Property Editor to the Web based…

Hello AMSW, I think I got most of that, but I'd feel more comfortable if you sent an NPM snapshot of the symptom of this problem (e.g. VSAN duplicated in Summary or whaever the visible effect is...). Feel free to post here or send directly to me.

Tks KwameB, I would expect this to be the normal behavior. Just for completeness, can you confirm what version of NPM you are running? Networkguy09, I recommend running Diagnostics and contacting support, for your issue. Francois Caron - Snr Product Manager

fmdir66, Yes, you need to look at the tracefile generated by this tool. Seems like you did this, but I don't understand your point about the "route confirmed". Dclick's point above is also a good way to eliminate options and narrow down your search. If you cam send me the trace, we can take a look

One more vote for this already existing enhancement request (13223)

What David describes is the known issue (60988). So we are back to the initial suggestion. Tks David. Deltona, can you post here the result of the test that David suggests? Tks Also, we are taking your suggestion into account (gray-out)

This is a known issue, that happens sometimes, usually triggered by a high number of elements being polled and short polling period (i.e. general load). How many elements do you have on teh same polling engine and what is the polling frequency? There are possible workarounds that you might want to look at: #1. Stop…

No it is not. We will contact some of you off line with additional questions.

Good one Byron. Added all these votes to the requirement (90042). Thanks all.

Added your vote.

Hi rgward, Look at File / Settings / Config Comparison/ Diaplsy x number of lines before and after each change. This should answer your question.

This might help: http://thwack.solarwinds.com/message/158625#158625

687K flows per second: is this peak or averaged across a fairly long period of time? Old custom reports have been archived for you to reference, you will need to rebuild those reports using the new web reporting interface that ships with 4.0. If you are unable to write a similar report with the new web reporting, you can…

CBQoS is untouched, this is only for the flow data. CBQoS is SNMP polling based and you can control the polling frequency in NTA Settings / "CBQoS Polling" resource. Default is 300sec but you can change it, in 4.0 or in versions before 4.0

Hi Deltona, We don't have a date set for when we will stop running on 32 bits, but my guess is that it wil come fairly soon after 4.0. As far as the versions running on 32 bits, 3.x and 4.0 (and possibly others after this, again, we don't know yet), they will be supported following our usual process, which means at least…

Anybody else interested in MicroTik devices, or has tried to develop templates for it and failed?