Comments
-
There is a linux agent now, too.
-
It doesn't *have* to be port 17790, you can pick a port and/or configure the agent locally to use a particular proxy. I've done this exactly as duncan.murray@capita.co.uk mentions for the same purpose - to monitor azure VM's. However, in my case I wanted a single IP and a single port - so I had one of the VM's in each…
-
Seems that way
-
also realized I neglected to include same details for 5K's, so that'll be uploaded shortly. One set of 5K's complete.
-
I dare to ask, but do you guys have more than say, 20-30 fex's? Pure speculation but curious. I think we had somewhere in that realm and it didn't error out. Also: SNMPv2 (laughably/sadly).
-
I suppose it makes sense, but maybe you want to rename the main page for What we're working on to Product Roadmap? Just keeping in the same logic going.
-
llinteau12 I couldn't edit my post yesterday to clarify that it is a possibility as opposed to a certainty Additionally, maybe you want to edit the time for this condition (note at the bottom of your screenshot) to something like 10-15 minutes? Thus, it will only trigger if you have *sustained* packet loss, which might…
-
I think SWUG is not the only useful thing, but great that it is recognized and rewarded for what it is. I felt like going to the SWUG was invaluable just to have a chance to talk to folks like cobrien and Dez and kong.yang among others that you don't really feel like you have the same chance otherwise. UX definitely…
-
Hahaha at least I don't have to email and ask you now
-
jdumke that's good feedback for jkuvlesk !
-
for 4): You don't want to run the SQL server on the Orion server - you could run NTA's netflow database on the server if you had a sufficient raid but that is not advised for SQL as your environment grows. With 184 nodes (lots of switches I'm assuming), you've got some time - but when you get to 1k or 2k nodes you're going…
-
That won't do it, because if you look above there is a single "Machine type" being used, which is pretty close to vendor in how they work normally. However, it's not identifying individual Brocade machine types. I'm guessing either A: daniels may need to update the MIB db, or b: that these need to be submitted *to* be…
-
I think you and I face similar issues most of the time, akhasheni. Scripted monitor was kinda what I was getting at, just a script to ping every X minutes and report that back. The HTTP/HTTPS monitor template is effectively checking availability if that is an option, too.
-
Yep. Sorry to say, but so much broke with 11.5 that I'm not really willing to risk breaking more with 11.5.1. Someone else can guinea pig this one (h/t to newkidd2 lol)
-
Installing with SQL express is basically if you're doing very few devices in NCM and no other Orion tools.
-
Hi ssaraswat , that is exactly what I said and what rob.hock's link provides. In the dependencies, what you want is (per your example): Firewall (parent dependency) -> child dependency group What this means is that as soon as the firewall is shown as down any nodes in the group will then be unmanaged, which will suppress…
-
paging rob.hock, maybe he knows who can best address mrchesnutt's question in detail.
-
Changing the group as indicated will move things
-
josh.haberman I've had that happen, sometimes it's Cisco confirmation of the upload that takes longer. Their SNTC tool is actually a VM, and it's scanning *continually* as opposed to how the NCM connector works. tyler.peterson , as much as it is a free tool it doesn't seem to be too well documented. Some customers (me)…
-
Add a system description? They pretty much are telling you what you needed.
-
Cisco folks can help with this, yes. You need to find out what Customer name they're actually using.
-
Absolutely, I do remember! The most crucial first steps I had to go through was understanding the nomenclature of the environment. Every single company I've ever worked for has their own way to tell you that server X is in (group a) but also (group b) and not (group c), whether that's…
-
I think what lfransen is getting at here is a way to filter out things that are not managed within Orion already. It makes sense on one level for appstack but it's also conflicting on another. Couldn't this be fixed/integrated in some way by interfacing with data from IVIM? Creating an account that can't see these VM's is…
-
I'm going to continue to tag DanielleH until she can unlock it from the store so I can actually use points on it. got stuck on the old system where 1 click = locked item, even if you didn't buy it.
-
I just thought something. After looking at Cisco UCS Active Hardware Alerts in Solarwinds and checking the UNDP, have you looked through what's available on the MIB doing an SNMPWalk starting around 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.719.1.1.1.1 or 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.719? Also reference: MIB Reference for Cisco UCS Manager - Accessing Cisco…
-
There were wireless heatmaps to show some of this in the old NPM maps. It wasn't as in depth though, as marcnetterfield points out. jblankjblank is that wireless heatmap stuff somewhere on the horizon to look at for the new environment (if people use it?)
-
Do you actually have your AD account (or a group that has been granted permissions) added to the Orion server as an account?
-
understood, thank you!
-
Yes, NTA currently installs it's own FSB - which is a mySQL DB if I recall correctly. So, of course the MS DB isn't showing it. As noted, the NTA DB should be installed on a separate server when possible. You *could* install it on the same server but it's not advised (resource contention).
-
so, I installed HF1 for SAM 6.2, and I still get an unknown site status on a site running IIS 7.5. I'm still getting Unexpected error occurred. Unable to read data from the transport connection: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. Should I mention this for my existing ticket 766133?