ctopaloglu

What is supportability enhancements?

Any update about Granular Node Management Rights? I decide to remind you every week in case you forget . Somebody just deleted 100+ nodes accidentally! I don't know what to do. I had to gave him node management rights but I don't want him to delete my nodes! Is it too much to ask?

You guys should really consider to improve the Network Atlas functionality. Just like in network weathermap. http://www.network-weathermap.com/files/images/dclvcoremap.preview.png Here is the idea for this http://thwack.solarwinds.com/ideas/1317 And we really need Granular node management rights as wel..

+1 for all of it.

Need it!

I assume that you are logging into NPM through AD group account. Unfortunately AD group accounts have that limitation. I already opened 2 cases about this to Solarwinds. The first answer was "It is by design" and the second answer to my last case was "The developers have stated as a bug" (Case #431564 - Bug Submitted). I…

Please post your opinion on the feature request Also you can post a reply to this post. It seems similar. http://thwack.solarwinds.com/ideas/1271

This is a good idea.

Example Use Case. Load Balancer Virtual IP addresses are the key for the service to work. But there is no way to show in on the map.

I like it. What I don't like it we have to do it these basic things!

Please update what we are working for UDT. It still shows UDT 1.0

You can use this parameter. "&Printable=true" Example: https://nms/Orion/SummaryView.aspx?viewid=153&Printable=true

Unfortunately the group view is not customizable like you said. This is must SO CALLED feature. But no roadmap information about this. We have the same problem. We have 350+ offices and we can not customize views for each of them. Can anybody tell me if this SO CALLED request is being followed? I want to learn the number.…

Add me please.

This resource should come OoB. We are all using it. http://thwack.solarwinds.com/docs/DOC-107687

I already opened a case to Solarwinds and they said it is routers (SRX650 & SRX2XX series) fault . So here is the solution for you. This query will clear the "Not Available" neighbours. If you want you can schedule it like I do. delete from NPM_RoutingNeighbor WHERE IsDeleted = 1 AND LastChange < DateAdd(day, -1, getdate())

Currently it is not possible to get IPFIX from netscaler. Please improve/enhance NTA to support this OoB.

You can work with me with the sampled NetFlow (sflow). We need this feature.

Please move this thread to feature requests. 

Can you please update this thread as feature request?

I would like to point out that monitoring DHCP split-scopes is more important than creating them with IPAM. Please concentrate on monitoring part. Thanks.

http://thwack.solarwinds.com/message/95916#95916 It has been 3 years since this feature is on the roadmap! Looks like it is forgotten like the rest.

+1

Thank you for this. I love it.

Kill for this one! Definitely needed!

+1. Or in add node page it can indicate (work load and status color for work load) which polling engine is applicable. So we can decide which to add.

Unless I'm missing something there doesn't appear to be a select all within a specific node to either import all or ignore all (interfaces, volumes) Here is what I am looking for. I have a switch that has upwards of 300 interfaces. I need about 280 of them ignored as they are user ports which we do not monitor. For me to…

needed!

Yeap that would work for me too. +1

I needed to.