Comments
-
There are no restrictions as to the type of IP address your monitoring with IPAM. It doesn't have to be in a private range. If you want to manage public addresses that's your choice, you just need the proper licensing to do the # of IP's. You might run into problems with Firewall rules, NAT rules, etc. etc. in trying to do…
-
Wow, I'm at a loss, I know netflow data is higher bandwidth than SNMP at times depending on the flows, but that seems very excessive. We're talking like 1-3% on our T1 at the most... How is your Netflow configured on the router, mostly interested in the commands with "flow" in them. ie: "show run | i flow"
-
You select what nodes a report will run under on a policy by policy basis. If you go back to manage policy report, and then to the "Manage Policies" tab, you should find it under "Cisco Security Audit version 01". Select the "Cisco Security Audit - SSH" and edit it and you will see the criteria upon which it decides which…
-
Hmmm.. That's odd. It wasn't just his message, but lots of responses to his message that disappeared? I would think if it was being moderated that there couldn't be replies to it? I know my inbox was not flagging his response as a new one, but rather a response to his message that was missing at the time. They are all back…
-
Yes, I know it would make things look a whole lot nicer for me for sure!! I haven't heard whether its actually been added to the "official" feature request list, but I'm pretty sure unless they hear from a bunch of people that they want it, that it won't get any velocity to getting the request done. Anyone else out there…
-
Ok, so you're getting similar results to what I got. Funky huh? As for the other method only returning 30 ports, those are probably some of the ones you have monitored in NPM like I mentioned... This query might help you figure out a bit more about the interfaces with the odd speeds. Plug in the speed to the WHERE…
-
ip flow-export source Loopback2 ip flow-export version 5 ip flow-export destination 10.24.192.228 9995 ip flow-export destination 10.24.253.124 2055
-
So, how do we diagnose this? I have it set to auto-place items on the map, but new items I've recently added aren't getting added. I've double checked the address format against mapquest and it should work. Should they get added to the map immediately? After a period of time? Trying to figure the ins and outs of how this…
-
How about memory usage of the SWJobEngineWorker.exe. Mine is getting above a Gigabit of RAM and it starts sending out spurios messages about APM stuff being unknown/down/up. If I shut/start the service it tends to go back to working ok for awhile. This did this in both 9.0 and now 9.1SP1. Last 25 Events 11/21/2008 12:22…
-
Have to keep you guys on your toes!! :-) Teach you how to use your product once in awhile... :-D Hopefully this will illustrate how we need this type of feature. Not only to check that something exists (ie: NTP server, SNMP community, etc), or that something specific doesn't exist (ie: "public" or "private" SNMP…
-
I believe you are correct that they are in the database, those backup files are quite old on my box, so not positive they are being used anymore. Might just be there as an artifact of an older installation. They do allow you to "Export" single device templates as a file, and you can import them also. Once that's done you…
-
Just double checking, in the Comparison Criteria table of what you're ignoring, the Enabled column is set to "Yes" by both of these rules? Your sure there are no spaces or anything after the "^:" that could be causing it to not find it? In looking a little closer I do have another rule that could fit that, which means…
-
***Interesting discovery made below*** :-) I was able to show the tech at least some of the behavior. My original compliance rule, which was checking to see that we had CDP neighbor enabled on Tunnel interfaces, had been executed enough so that it was down to only being violated on a little over 100 nodes. Given a couple…
-
Ok, to make sure Solarwinds takes notice, I've created a voting topic on this to get them to go back to the old behavior... Go vote here!!
-
You should be able to get the "switch engine" or CatOS side IP by doing a "show cdp neighbor detail" on the layer-3 engine.
-
The FSDB is going to get potentially hit with a lot of data and the way it stores its data on the hard drive will mean it should have very fast and unrestricted access to its storage. Check out the requirements and if you honestly think you can set up a VM that can meet the requirements, then give it a try. I'd recommend a…
-
Yea, quite often it will include the Null interface, doesn't bother me much, but try this instead... SELECT COUNT(InterfaceDescription) AS NumPorts, N.Caption FROM NCM.Interfaces I JOIN Orion.Nodes N ON (I.Node.CoreNodeID = N.NodeID) WHERE NOT ((InterfaceTypeName like '%Virtual%') OR (InterfaceTypeName = 'other')) GROUP BY…
-
Actually the join should be fairly simple. Just give each database name an alias, can't remember what database the custom properties are in APM. Something like SELECT A.NodeID AS APMNode, N.NodeID AS CoreNodeID FROM Nodes N JOIN APM_HardwareInfo A ON (A.NodeID = N.NodeID) Should give you an idea of what you'd need to do if…
-
Try looking at what the actual values are in the database. I don't see anything set to 2027 in my table, but lots of other dates like 2017 and such. There are also quite a few "NULL" values in EndOfSupport. Very possible that if its a null value that Solarwinds might just display 1/12/2027 for whatever reason? ie: a…
-
There is no database column named "Part Number", so I was taking a longshot. I can't tell though, are you saying that worked, or that it didn't? If not, I'll probably need you to comb some of the database fields to see if you can find the values you're looking for. If you have the SDK loaded, you can do it via that, or it…
-
Hmm... I don't think that would be it. Orion knows how to discover both the router and it's embedded AP correctly, and as separate devices which they really are even though they are contained inside a single box. It just assigns the wrong view by device type, and then if you go and correct it, it changes your corrections…
-
I would think so, you definitely get better NTA performance out of 4.X. Rather than have a dedicated poller, put your bucks into the new NTA no-sql database server that is required for it.
-
Oh, don't get me wrong, I've been working with regular expressions for maybe 25+ years and am very familiar with basic ones and quite a few advanced features. However, I've never worked much with Atomic Grouping, Lookbehind or other newer features like those. So it took me awhile to figure out where your regex was going.…
-
I'm doing this now, might not be the most efficient way of doing it, but it works for me. Have been able to convert 100's of Cisco devices over to having SSH configured on them. The key is, its a few compliance policies, not a single one. Just the way things are set up. It would be useful for compliance rules to be able to…
-
Hmm... Am I missing something? There is a "Custom Property Editor" on the "Additional Web Server"? I know I have a custom property editor on my primary polling system that is available via logging into the system via RDP or whatever. But I haven't seen a "Custom Property Editor" either on the website or by logging into my…
-
Well, I doubt the config portion of NCM will ever do that, it doesn't really have any intelligence, at least AFAIK, about things like what IP addresses and such that it sees. ie: It doesn't "learn" them and keep a database of what it sees in a config. It's mainly about the text of the config file and how it might have…
-
Oh, almost forgot, assuming I'm on the right track, there is a query you can use to find all the offending devices, does a pretty good job. Just plug it into SWQL Studio, or customize a page you want it on, add a "Custom Query" resource to it and plug this into it... SELECT I.InterfaceName, N.Caption, N.DetailsURL AS…
-
Is this documented somewhere? I haven't been able to find it. They're trying to force us to move to Server Core here also, against my judgement...
-
So, from how Cisco explains it, that particular MIB (dot1dBasePortIfIndex) is a list of ifIndex's of ports in a given VLAN. Since the "default" is VLAN 1, if no ports are in VLAN 1, they return no ports. They say they interpret this the same way across all devices and IOS's, and from what I've seen they do. There are other…
-
"^.?*set admintimout 480"? Trying to interpret your regex and its failing me a bit. ^ - anchors it to the beginning of the line. . - matches >any< character ? - makes the preceding token optional, in this case '.' * - matches 0 or more of the previous character, in this case the '?' that makes the preceding token optional?…