Comments
-
It's hard to scope some of these app's or what may 'catch on' next. I'm sure they scoped the initial usage and had their marks they needed to meet; but did they scope the the available resources of infrastructure? All good and fine to think you can fire up X more servers and bandwidth - but it's hard to do if the service…
-
Great points, and from someone who has experienced the lack of a stream line process; that type of structure can have you working toward gathering the proper data to have a fruitful effort. I have been stuck with aged data at times that would only show a supposed possibility of a culprit. IF there was better correlation…
-
I have seen throwing more resources at the problem only amplify the issue in so many cases. Server resources for applications that have issues and use all the given resources such as CPU and RAM then RAM is added have caused the application to bottleneck the CPU faster and then increasing CPU speed and cores expound…
-
Gubment doesn't give it's cheese to just anyone now. If you can't bear the red tape you don't get the cake.
-
You know things don't work like they used, or people for that matter. It's got to be more than your favorite vendor and their prime sales folks that roll through with that Amex for lunch card you so love. true investigation to determine the extent of use and full capabilities of your purchased tool should be the first step…
-
VROps, SCOM, Splunk, NetBrain (might still be out there), UCS, vSphere, Cherwell, Not sure if Cacti is still running somewhere collecting specific logs for some 1 guy... we are so big and widespread that other departments and entities have in the past implemented their own solution for monitoring what they need.
-
toast and jelly man.
-
My yesterday's plan revived! Thanks for reminding me I need to spend some points!
-
Whew, I was about to feed my snapshot breakfast; It's a good thing I kept reading before pouring the milk over some cheerio's!
-
Oatmeal Bump!
-
I can see the need for this from your angle. It does make me curious about how many custom properties that you have setup. To me setting up CP's along with management where you can simply change the custom property value per node/device/entity and never touch the alert. At the base I would have CP Values for Limits(1 & 2),…
-
I'll vote for this one twice. ... ... and thanks for figuring this out. As I am trying to find a way to remove the line numbers to allow a copy of config for my tech's with Read Only Access to NCM. How do you copy and paste a config without having to remove the line numbers manually after your paste?
-
Only if you do not set your thresholds and enable NPM Alerts to tell us about if before we are all gone.
-
on my test box.... where 11.5 runs.
-
Exec's usually get to do what they want, as long as it doesn't infringe on someone else directly at the office.
-
Slacker Hacker! Keep it Movin Bump! #Weallhack #bumpsqaud
-
Also useful for Nexus Tables.
-
Yes, very nice indeed!
-
Knowing what is coming always helps.. if you're paying attention. And I do think that 'Fewer surprises, results in better business discussions.'
-
Somethings waiting in the bushes for us.....
-
This is good stuff. I currently poll for AP Name, Type, Serial #, # of Connected users, etc. It would be much nicer to have more details pulled from the device. *Consider hardware health for the controller? Where is that?
-
Congrats goodzhere! Now check out this cool story ->
-
You can add the AP as a node to get all of these enabled. - It would be nice to allow some of the setup without the full node entity for the AP.
-
Nice!
-
Monday Bump!
-
don't forget to shake your fist in the air when you yell that.
-
Will you do a followup session with what you can expect from SW IPAM?
-
This would be wonderful - be sure to add an option to allow or disallow per account...and then wrap your standard limitations around that to create the users 'world' they can control if need be.
