This discussion has been locked. The information referenced herein may be inaccurate due to age, software updates, or external references.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a similar question you can start a new discussion in this forum.

IPAM ISC-DHCPD AddressReservations

Hello,

we have the following system environment: Solarwind IPAM-4.3 and ISC-4.3.1-DHCP-Server (debian jessie).

Our problem:

IPAM-4.3 cannot get the fixed address reservation records from the ISC DHCP server.

Does somebody have an idea / a workaround?

- Thanks -

  • Hi,

    Can you put a sample of host declaration defined in your conf file?

    Thanks,

  • Hello,

    thanks you for your reply, here the desired sample:

    subnet 10.67.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {

    option domain-name-servers 141.53.65.75, 141.53.67.75,

    10.67.50.75, 141.

    53.65.237, 141.53.65.238, 10.67.51.75, 10.67.52.75, 141.53.59.75;

    option routers 10.67.19.1;

    range 10.67.19.251 10.67.19.254;

    host ms719019.testxxx.de {

    hardware ethernet 00:E1:6D:8F:74:FF;

    fixed-address 10.67.19.19;

    }

    host ms719020.testxxx.de {

    hardware ethernet 00:E1:6D:8F:74:1F;

    fixed-address 10.67.19.20;

    }

    host ms719021.testxxx.de {

    hardware ethernet 00:E1:6D:8F:72:1F;

    fixed-address 10.67.19.21;

    }

    }

    Best regards

    Am 26.05.2015 um 11:12 schrieb sathya4046:

    >

    <thwack.solarwinds.com>

    >

    IPAM ISC-DHCPD AddressReservations

    reply from sathya4046

    <thwack.solarwinds.com/.../sathya4046

    in /IP Address Manager/ - View the full discussion

    <thwack.solarwinds.com/.../279735

    >

  • looking at the config, I could see the reservations are made for the IP address that doesn't fall in the IP range defined in the scope. IPAM is not considering these reservations unless they are within the scope range.

    Also we would not recommend to have nested statement i.e. Host statements are defined within subnet declaration. Preferably, you can define the host statements outside the subnet declaration and it makes no difference in behavior.

    -sathya