This discussion has been locked. The information referenced herein may be inaccurate due to age, software updates, or external references.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a similar question you can start a new discussion in this forum.

I want to build an alert that queries a Custom Property string, I want to type the value in the alert, not select from a drop down list.

So I have some alerts I'm building and I want to be able to type in a value instead of selecting one of the set items I've defined.

I've set a Custom Property called Site that has a list of our sites with the type of connection in the site title

Example:

Pluto (MPLS)

Our environment has many different connections. MPLS being one type that several sites have.

So, I want to alert on:

Node - Site - Contains - (MPLS)      I want to be able to type the (MPLS) value in the value box. But it's only letting me select from the drop down box of all the sites I've created.

However if you go Node - Node Name - Contains -   , I can type the value in, which I did in the pic for (MPLS) and (SAT)

Picture for reference, the top string I can only select from the drop down at the very end that has (VPN) listed.

asdf.JPG

Parents
  • This is an interesting one. I tried same and I could not do it. Now, this can be "by design", because the Custom Property is based on drop-down values, however, I do agree that filter "contains" does suggests that we should be able to manually enter value. Hmm... maybe someone from Product Team can chip in to comment on this

    On the other hand - why would you use two different parameters in one custom property. Just split them into [SITE] and [TYPE] - this will give you much more flexibility in the future. For example you may have a lot of devices on Pluto with different connections - MPLS, Leased Line, VPN - you name them. When it comes down to reporting and filtering - how do you easily know how many devices you have on Pluto? Or how many MPLS devices you have across all you r infrastructure and all sites? You will need a math and all these complications and extra filtering as above

    So, I strongly recommenced you to split them into two

    Alex

  • Totally understand - but I'm building it the way a client wants it. I preferred a different method and spoke at length about it, much like the way you're saying, but they're not interested.

Reply Children