0 Replies Latest reply on Apr 21, 2017 6:58 PM by dewolfe03

    Alerting on group members - not using parent /child relationship


      I am trying to set up alerting for a group of Cisco ASAs that we have at remote locations (group 1).  Unfortunately, we also have Cisco ASAs at locations that I want to alert differently than the first group (group 2). 


      I have "Alert me when a node goes down - Group 1" and "Alert me when a node goes down - Group 1"


      Is grouping for alerting a bad practice instead of by node?  I see advantages.  It seems that it would be more difficult to set up, but easier to manage.


      I am a newb at this, so all constructive input is welcome.