cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Create Post

Our MS rep told us this month that Skype is being replaced by Team.  I'll be interested to see what the final product environment looks like.

Having used EOC, it wasn't the solution my organization needed, but I can see where it is appropriate for other organizations.

0 Kudos
Reply

Currently using Cisco Jabber and Cisco VOIP and it works perfectly. Used Jabber and Microsoft VOIP at my last job and it was a mess.

Skype for IM is fine and actually works pretty well in some cases.

Skype for VoIP is abysmal.

We have switched from Cisco, to Shortel, and now Skype/Lync, and I have to say, the last is the worst by far.

0 Kudos
Reply

Interesting.  Our Skype voice is reliable.  Occasionally I'll see an individual workstation or headset that's problematic, one which consistently works OK for 30 minutes then drops.  I haven't found the cause, but it may be associated with a specific model/version of PC or headset.

My PC & headset work well, and have since Day One.  Better than Skype has.

0 Kudos
Reply

We are using both but with the intention that Skype goes away. Teams is relatively new to us so not many people are comfortable with it yet.

0 Kudos
Reply

We have moved our lync over to sfb and getting good call quality in some areas has been a real @#$% to figure out.  Using some newer netflow tools has helped to get the QOS under control but this sfb isn't all it was cracked up to be and I'm not sure it's really 100% anywhere at all but it is what we have now.  Everyone thought this would save us money going this route but it's often worse than what we had before.  I hope the new stuff is better than this... that's all I can say.  Basically anything might be better than sfb.

0 Kudos
Reply

That's too bad.  Internal Skype has worked well for us, and we only occasionally ran into issues with SFB when using it across the Internet with other Skype customers--usually when trying to share screens.

It's gotten better, but still, anytime you've got something that wants QoS across the Internet to work well, it's a rotten design.

0 Kudos
Reply

Starting to implement Skype and Teams.  What joy.

We were looking at going from Lync to Skype because it is the "next" thing, but Skype has some issues with various OS and Office versions we have deployed. It also kills the older chat clients, leaving people cut off if you can't complete the rollout all at once. If we go Teams we get the brand new experience (for better or worse) but can leave the old chat client there for people to use during the rollout. It is Teams for the whole company, and in a smaller scale IT has Slack in case the Microsoft stack fails.

From what I've read too Microsoft Teams is a very different product, although both fulfill some of the same requirements.  We've had issues with Skype at some sites.  Some was tied to misconfigured virtual firepower sensors which didn't have enough memory or cpu and adjustments helped there.