This template assesses the performance of a Microsoft SQL Server 2012 database by retrieving performance data from the built-in master.sysperfinfo pseudo-table.
Credentials: SQL Server user name and password.
The number of users currently connected to the SQL Server.
Note: It is recommended to review this counter along with “Batch Requests/Sec”. A surge in “user connections” may result in a surge of “Batch Requests/Sec”. So if there is a disparity (one going up and the other staying flat or going down), then that may be a cause for concern. With a blocking problem, for example, you might see user connections, lock waits, and lock wait time all increase, while batch requests/sec decrease.
Total Server Memory (KB)
The Total Server Memory is the current amount of memory that SQL Server is using. If this counter is still growing, the server has not yet reached its steady-state, and it is still trying to populate the cache and get pages loaded into memory. Performance will likely be somewhat slower during this time since more disk I/O is required at this stage. This behavior is normal. Eventually Total Server Memory should approximate Target Server Memory.
Set a threshold according to your environment.
Target Server Memory (KB)
The total amount of dynamic memory the server can consume.
Buffer cache hit ratio
This SQL Server Buffer Cache Hit Ratio counter indicates how often SQL Server goes to the buffer, not the hard disk, to get data. In OLTP applications, this ratio should exceed 90%, and ideally be over 99%.If your buffer cache hit ratio is lower than 90%, you should consider adding RAM. If the ratio is between 90% and 99%, then you should consider adding more RAM, as the closer you get to 99%, the faster your SQL Server will perform. In some cases, if your database is very large, you may not be able to get close to 99%, even if you put the maximum amount of RAM in your server. All you can do is add as much as you can, and then live with the consequences. In OLAP applications, the ratio can be much less because of the nature of how OLAP works. In any case, more RAM should increase the performance of SQL Server.
Number of physical database page reads issued. 80 – 90 per second is normal; anything that is above indicates indexing or memory constraint.
Values for this counter will vary between database applications, but this information is useful when determining if SQL Server is the primary application using the disk. If the Buffer Manager page read-writes are low but disk-queue lengths are high, there might be a disk bottleneck. If the Page read-writes are higher than normal, a memory shortage is likely to exist.
Number of physical database page writes issued. 80 – 90 per second is normal, anything more we need to check the lazy writer/sec and checkpoint counters, if these counters are also relatively high then, it is a memory constraint. Values for this counter will vary between database applications, but this information is useful when determining if SQL Server is the primary application using the disk. If the Buffer Manager page read-writes are low but disk-queue lengths are high, there might be a disk bottleneck. If the Page read-writes are higher than normal, a memory shortage is likely to exist.
Number of buffers written per second by the lazy writer system process. The lazy writer flushes out old, dirty buffer cache pages to make them available for reuse. If the value of this counter is higher than 20, then the server could use additional RAM.
Page Life Expectancy
The time in seconds before the average data page is removed from the cache buffer.
If the average page life falls below 300 seconds, this may indicate that your SQL server may require more RAM to improve performance.
This counter reports how many times users waited to acquire a lock over the past second. Note that while you are actually waiting on the lock, this is not reflected in this counter. It gets incremented only when you “wake up” after waiting on the lock. If this value is nonzero, then it is an indication that there is at least some level of blocking occurring. If you combine this with the Lock Wait Time counter, you can get some idea of how long the blocking lasted. A zero value for this counter can definitively rule out blocking as a potential cause; a nonzero value will require looking at other information to determine whether it is significant.
Total number of logins started per second. This does not include pooled connections.
This is the number of latch requests that could not be granted immediately. In other words, these are the amount of latches in a one second period that had to wait.
Latches are light-weight synchronization constructs that are designed to protect the physical integrity of a page in a similar way to how locks protect the logical consistency of rows. They're taken any time something wants to modify a page, be it moving the page from disk to memory or via versa, writing a record onto a page, or changing a page's metadata.
This counter monitors the number of full scans on base tables or indexes. Values greater than 1 or 2 indicate that we are having table / Index page scans. If we see high CPU then we need to investigate this counter. Otherwise, if the full scans are on small tables, we can ignore this counter. Two of the main causes of high Full Scans/sec are missing indexes and too many rows requested.
Queries with missing indexes or too many rows requested will have a large number of logical reads and an increased CPU time.
This counter measures the number of batch requests that SQL Server receives per second, and generally follows in step to how busy your server's CPUs are. Generally speaking, over 1000 batch requests per second indicates a very busy SQL Server, and could mean that if you are not already experiencing a CPU bottleneck, that you may be experiencing one soon. Of course, this is a relative number, and the bigger your hardware, the more batch requests per second SQL Server can handle. From a network bottleneck approach, a typical 100Mbs network card is only able to handle about 3000 batch requests per second. If you have a server that is this busy, you may need to have two or more network cards, or go to a 1Gbs network card.
Note: Sometimes low batch requests/sec can be misleading. If there were a SQL statements/sec counter, this would be a more accurate measure of the amount of SQL Server activity. For example, an application may call only a few stored procedures, yet each stored procedure does a lot of work. In that case, we will see a low number for batch requests/sec but each stored procedure (one batch) will execute many SQL statements that drive CPU and other resources. As a result, many counter thresholds based on the number of batch requests/sec will seem to identify issues, because the batch requests on such a server are unusually low for the level of activity on the server. We cannot conclude that a SQL Server is not active simply by looking at only batch requests/sec. Rather, you have to do more investigation before deciding there is no load on the server. If the average number of batch requests/sec is below 5 and other counters (such as SQL Server processor utilization) confirm the absence of significant activity, then there is not enough of a load to make any recommendations or identify issues regarding scalability.
Note: Set this threshold according to your environment.
The number of queries that are currently blocked. Poorly written queries can block eventhe faster, more efficient queries and make them slow.
This value should be as low as possible.
Fragmentation (%) of Most Fragmented Table
The fragmentation percentage of the most fragmented table in the database. Fragmentation occurs naturally because INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statements are not typically distributed equally among the table rows and its indexes, creating variations in how full each page is. For queries that scan portions of the indexes of a table, fragmentation can cause additional page reads. This values should be as close to zero as possible, but values from 0 – 10% may be acceptable.
Fragmented Tables in Database
The number of tables in the database that have one or more out-of-order index pages.
Row Count of Largest Table
The number of rows in the largest table in the database.
The number of database transactions started in the last second.
Memory Grants Pending
Total number of processes waiting to acquire a workspace memory grant.
Average Lock Wait Time (ms)
The average wait time in milliseconds of each lock request that had a wait time. This value should be kept under 500ms. Wait times over 500ms may indicate blocking.
The number of lock requests per second that time out. This number includes NOWAIT lock requests.
Total Size (KB) of Database Files
The total size of the database data files.
Longest Transaction Running Time
The length of time in seconds the transaction that has been running the longest has been active.
The total number of log bytes flushed.
The number of SQL compilations that occur each second. Values higher than 100 indicate a high proportion of adhoc queries and may be using up valuable CPU time. Solutions include rewriting adhoc queries as stored procedures and using sp_executeSQL. This value should be as low as possible, preferably under 10% of the Batch Requests/sec.
The number of lock requests that end up in a deadlock per second. This value should less than 1.
Total Size (KB) of Log Files
The total size of the database log files.
Memory Manager: Connection Memory (KB)
This monitor returns the total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for maintaining connections.
Memory Manager: Database Cache Memory (KB)
This monitor returns the amount of memory the server is currently using for the database pages cache.
Memory Manager: Free Memory (KB)
This monitor returns the amount of committed memory currently not used by the server.
Memory Manager: Lock Memory (KB)
This monitor returns the total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for locks.
Memory Manager: Optimizer Memory (KB)
This monitor returns the total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for query optimization.
Memory Manager: SQL Cache Memory (KB)
This monitor returns the total amount of dynamic memory the server is using for the dynamic SQL cache.
Portions of this document were originally created by and are excerpted from the following sources:
Microsoft Corporation, “MSDN Library,” Copyright © 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Available at
SolarWinds solutions are rooted in our deep connection to our user base in the THWACK® online community. More than 150,000 members are here to solve problems, share technology and best practices, and directly contribute to our product development process. Learn more today by joining now.