Closed

Closed due to inactivity. Received 66 votes with last vote on 28 Jun 2019.

FEATURE REQUEST - #412437 Distinction between trunk and non-trunk interfaces

Hi.

I have the following suggestions.

In the advanced alert manager it should be possible to choose Interface.IsTrunk == true/false for the creation of alerts.

The ability to make reports concerning trunk interfaces would also be highly desirable.

When performing a device discovery it should also be possible to filter the device resources by trunk.

In an ideal world the filtering should be checkboxes that are combinable so as it would be possible to select resources that are "active" AND "IsTrunk".

Regards,

Tobias

  • One issue with the Cisco designation of trunk are POE interfaces with phones and a PC on them.  Technically this is a trunk, but not the kind of trunk we want to watch.  The logic would have to be something like trunks with greater then 3 vlans allowed, or 3 vlans active....  gets a bit tricky...

    PeterLyttle has the right idea where we add a customization to the interface, but that is manual and time consuming process if you have 2000 switches and a team installing them that doesn't always follow the "standard"  :-) But it is the best idea so far....

    The idea of device discovery is great, but again, with large quantities of switches being discovered it makes the process fairly cumbersome. 

  • I have voted up your request as I have the same issue but also have a work around.  I have my Cisco Trunk with a description that contains the word "trunk".  I can then do an alert where Vendor=Cisco & FullName or Caption (or something like that) that contains the word "trunk".

    I think you could also do it with SQL like this -

    SELECT * FROM dbo.Nodes as N

    JOIN dbo.Interfaces as I

    ON I.NodeID = N.NodeID

    WHERE N.Vendor='Cisco'

    AND I.Caption like '%Trunk%'