To the cloud!

Private, Public, Hybrid, Infrastructure as a Service, Database as a Service, Software Defined Datacenter; call it what you will but for the sake of this post I’m going to sum it all up as cloud.   When virtualization started to become mainstream we seen a lot of enterprises adopt a “virtualization first” strategy, meaning new services and applications introduced to the business will first be considered to be virtualized unless a solid case for acquiring physical hardware can be made.   As the IT world shifts we are seeing this strategy move more towards a “cloud first” strategy.  Companies are asking themselves questions such as “Are there security policies stating we must run this inside of our datacenter?”, “Will cloud provide a more highly available platform for this service?”, and “Is it cost effective for us to place this service elsewhere?”.

Honestly, for a lot of services the cloud makes sense!  But is your database environment one of them?  From my experiences I’ve seen database environments stay relatively static.  The database sat on different pieces of physical hardware and watched us implement our “virtualization first” strategies.  We’ve long virtualized web front ends, the application servers and all the other pieces of our infrastructure but have yet to make the jump on the database.  Sometimes it’s simply due to performance, but with the advances in hypervisors as of late we can’t necessarily blame it on metrics anymore.  And now we are seeing cloud solutions such as DBaaS and IaaS present themselves to us.  Most of the time, the database is the heart of the company.  The main revenue driver for our business and customers, and it gets so locked up in change freezes that we have a hard time touching it.  But today, let’s pretend that the opportunity to move “to the cloud” is real.

When we look at running our databases in the cloud we really have two main options; DBaaS (Database functionalities delivered directly to us) and IaaS (The same database functionality being provided, but allowing us to control a portion of the infrastructure underneath it.)  No matter the choice we make, to me, the whole “database in the cloud” scenario is one big trade off.  We trade away our control and ownership of the complete stack in our datacenters to gain the agility and mobility that cloud can provide us with.

Think about it!  Currently, we have the ability to monitor the complete stack that our database lives on.  We see all traffic coming into the environment, all traffic going out, we can monitor every single switch, router, and network device that is inside of our four datacenter walls.  We can make BIOS changes to the servers our database resides on.  We utterly have complete and ??? control over how our database performs (with the exception of closed vendor code )  In a cloudy world, we hand over that control to our cloud provider.  Sure, we can usually still monitor performance metrics based on the database operations, but we don’t necessarily know what else is going on in the environment.  We don’t know who our “neighbors” are or if what they are doing is affecting us in anyway.  We don’t know what changes or tweaks might be going on below the stack that hosts our database.  On the flip side though, do we care?  We’ve paid good money for these services and SLAs and put our trust in the cloud provider to take care of this for us.  In return, we get agility.  We get functionality such as faster deployment times.  We aren’t waiting anymore for servers to arrive or storage to be provisioned.  In the case of DBaaS we get embedded best practices.  A lot of DBaaS providers do one thing and one thing alone; make databases efficient, fast, resilient and highly available.  Sometimes the burden of DR and recovery is taken care of for us.  We don’t need to buy two of everything.  Perhaps the biggest advantage though is the fact that we only pay for what we use.  As heavy resource peaks emerge we can burst and scale up, automatically.   When those periods of time are over we can retract and scale back down.

So thoughtful remarks for the week – What side of the “agility vs control” tradeoff do you or your business take?  Have you already made a move to hosting a database in the cloud?  What do you see as the biggest benefit/drawback to using something like DBaaS?   How has cloud changed the way you monitor and run your database infrastructure?

There is definitely no right or wrong answers this week – I’m really just looking for stories.  And these stories may vary depending your cloud provider of choice.  To some providers, this trade-off may not even exist.  To those doing private cloud, you may have the best of both worlds.

As this is my fourth and final post with the ambassador title I just wanted to thank everyone for the comments over the past month...  This is a great community with tons of engagement and you can bet that I won’t be going anywhere, ambassador or not!

Parents
  • I have been looking at the Cloud and its progress in terms of companies migrating over to it for the last 5 years. I have worked in various places including as a Virtualisation consultant (doing the planning and migrating), Microsoft Exchange server upgrades, AD migrations etc etc. I now work as an IT manager and recently undertook a 5 year strategy so did some extensive research on where things are going (or at least where I believed them to be going) so I often like to keep an eye on it as I am not a fan of the Cloud but like to be sure that I am not pushing our companies in the wrong direction. I have had a lot of time to digest, review and experience the cloud and from my technical background I have found that the majority of people pushing it are either Data centers, marketeers or software companies. All of which are set to gain significantly by companies moving to the cloud.

    The reasons I dont think the CLoud is viable right now:

    1.) How many times in IT for the company you work for will you need to connect two completely different things together? How easy is that going to be when its in the cloud? (I probably didnt word that right but hopefully you know what I mean). As an example, say we have a Database held on site and we have moved to Exchange Cloud but there is something that needs to hook in, something fairly complex that you used to be able to do in powershell on Exchange but now you only get access to some web based gui for exchange, so you have to go through the Microsoft support to get it done if it can be done at all. Also with Exchange in the cloud and the DB is local perhaps there is a performance problem as you have things linked over the internet instead of over gigabit on the LAN. Anyway prob a bad example but hoopefully you get what I mean.

    2.) At the cloud hosting provider, who cares (or how much) about getting things working again? If you host it, you have control. I cannot imagine a worse situation than having a cloud based service down and not being able to resolve the issue quickly myself. You will be at the mercy of lesser admins troubleshooting your issues who dont care about your business as much as you do. Ok, quite a strong statement but again there is hopefully some truth in it.

    3.) Price? If I renew my infrastructure/software around every 4 years, i cannot make Cloud a viable option. Everytime I have looked at pricing for moving out production servers on cloud based platforms using specs required its more expensive.Also in lean years, you dont have to upgrade you can stretch another year if you own the kit, If you rent, well thats that, you have to pay. Also, what happens when they have your data and software? prices rise.... not easy to migrate to another cloud provider....

    4.) When the internet goes down or is slow what happens to your production? Keeping it onsite would avoid this.

    I do think Cloud has its place but its perhaps for things that help mobility like cloud storage or for some particular types of software. The only thing I can see that would make me want to move to the cloud is if it was significantly cheaper than hosting your own kit and buying perpetual licenses but as far as I can tell that is not happening right now.

    As someone recently said to me" If the cloud worked, everyone would be doing it by now". Virtualisation worked thats why everyone did it. it was a good thing. The Cloud has too many problems like performance, lack of control, cost security etc. Anyone suggesting moving to the cloud will eventually hit a dead end and suggest "Hybrid" deplyoments which is what i think will happen in the end.

Comment
  • I have been looking at the Cloud and its progress in terms of companies migrating over to it for the last 5 years. I have worked in various places including as a Virtualisation consultant (doing the planning and migrating), Microsoft Exchange server upgrades, AD migrations etc etc. I now work as an IT manager and recently undertook a 5 year strategy so did some extensive research on where things are going (or at least where I believed them to be going) so I often like to keep an eye on it as I am not a fan of the Cloud but like to be sure that I am not pushing our companies in the wrong direction. I have had a lot of time to digest, review and experience the cloud and from my technical background I have found that the majority of people pushing it are either Data centers, marketeers or software companies. All of which are set to gain significantly by companies moving to the cloud.

    The reasons I dont think the CLoud is viable right now:

    1.) How many times in IT for the company you work for will you need to connect two completely different things together? How easy is that going to be when its in the cloud? (I probably didnt word that right but hopefully you know what I mean). As an example, say we have a Database held on site and we have moved to Exchange Cloud but there is something that needs to hook in, something fairly complex that you used to be able to do in powershell on Exchange but now you only get access to some web based gui for exchange, so you have to go through the Microsoft support to get it done if it can be done at all. Also with Exchange in the cloud and the DB is local perhaps there is a performance problem as you have things linked over the internet instead of over gigabit on the LAN. Anyway prob a bad example but hoopefully you get what I mean.

    2.) At the cloud hosting provider, who cares (or how much) about getting things working again? If you host it, you have control. I cannot imagine a worse situation than having a cloud based service down and not being able to resolve the issue quickly myself. You will be at the mercy of lesser admins troubleshooting your issues who dont care about your business as much as you do. Ok, quite a strong statement but again there is hopefully some truth in it.

    3.) Price? If I renew my infrastructure/software around every 4 years, i cannot make Cloud a viable option. Everytime I have looked at pricing for moving out production servers on cloud based platforms using specs required its more expensive.Also in lean years, you dont have to upgrade you can stretch another year if you own the kit, If you rent, well thats that, you have to pay. Also, what happens when they have your data and software? prices rise.... not easy to migrate to another cloud provider....

    4.) When the internet goes down or is slow what happens to your production? Keeping it onsite would avoid this.

    I do think Cloud has its place but its perhaps for things that help mobility like cloud storage or for some particular types of software. The only thing I can see that would make me want to move to the cloud is if it was significantly cheaper than hosting your own kit and buying perpetual licenses but as far as I can tell that is not happening right now.

    As someone recently said to me" If the cloud worked, everyone would be doing it by now". Virtualisation worked thats why everyone did it. it was a good thing. The Cloud has too many problems like performance, lack of control, cost security etc. Anyone suggesting moving to the cloud will eventually hit a dead end and suggest "Hybrid" deplyoments which is what i think will happen in the end.

Children
No Data
Thwack - Symbolize TM, R, and C