Why do you need more than NPM's interface traffic and NTA's flow analysis

We recently saw that "Cisco NBAR support" was voted #1 enhancement request for NTA - the Network Traffic Analyzer.

Above and beyond NBAR, we are wondering what are your most important needs for advanced traffic analysis techniques such as Network Based Application Recognition-NBAR, Deep Packet Inspection-DPI, Flexible Netflow

More on this topic here

Poll Results
  • Breakdown my traffic by application and user, like Netflow does ... but better (shared port 80, dynamic ports) (41%)
    117/285
  • I need an aggregated view of the Quality of Experience rendered by my applications, to my users (e.g. average latency experienced by my users for all my mission critical apps) (20%)
    58/285
  • I need help troubleshooting slow access to applications, down to the packet/transaction level (23%)
    65/285
  • Security is key for us and I need to know exactly who is doing what (e.g. access to file share, copyrighted content download, access to unwanted URLs...) (16%)
    45/285

Comments

Archive Poll

Confirm archive of Why do you need more than NPM's interface traffic and NTA's flow analysis

Archiving expires a poll and removes it from the active polls list.

To restore an archived poll, edit the poll, change the dates as desired, and save the poll.

Delete Poll

Confirm delete of Why do you need more than NPM's interface traffic and NTA's flow analysis

Warning: This will delete the poll and all of its comments.

SolarWinds uses cookies on its websites to make your online experience easier and better. By using our website, you consent to our use of cookies. For more information on cookies, see our cookie policy.